[COFF] How much Fortran?
Dave Horsfall
dave at horsfall.org
Tue Feb 4 05:50:52 AEST 2020
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020, Clem Cole wrote:
> Frankly, I would have expected the folks at this(these) NASA
> contractor(s) to have used assembler in those days under the guise of
> "efficiency;" but Fortran-IV would definitely have been popular at many
> contractors that would have been doing the work. The article mentions
> Fortran-V which I find interesting because I did not believe it was
> really much of a thing (i.e. it was never standardized). Basically, as
> I understood it from my Fortran peeps at DEC/Intel, F-V was the Waterloo
> extensions (a.k.a. WatFor) that got picked up by most people and in
> particular, IBM added to the FORTRAN/G or H compiler for the S/360. DEC
> had gone in a different direction still with VMS FORTRAN, although I
> believe they had picked up the things like WRITE(*) from Waterloo.
And WATFIV as well, as I recall from my student days; it was closer to
FORTRAN than WATFOR was (both were "student" compilers e.g. better error
messages but not the best of generated code).
-- Dave
More information about the COFF
mailing list