[TUHS] Isaacson v Unix [really RMS bashing]

A. P. Garcia a.phillip.garcia at gmail.com
Mon Jan 7 12:59:21 AEST 2019


On Sun, Jan 6, 2019, 9:39 PM Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019, 7:06 PM Steve Nickolas <usotsuki at buric.co wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019, A. P. Garcia wrote:
>>
>> If not for GNU, Unix would still have been cloned.  Net/2 happened in
>> parallel, did it not?
>>
>
> Berkeley actively rewrote most of unix yes. Net/1 was released about the
> same time GNU was getting started. Net/2 and later 4.4 BSD continued this
> trend, where 4.4 was finally a complete system. BSD386 only lagged Linux by
> about a year and had much stronger networking support, but supported fewer
> obscure devices than linux...
>
> Warner
>
> Ps I know this glosses over a lot, and isn't intended to be pedantic as to
> who got where first. Only they were about the same time... and I'm
> especially glossing over the AT&T suits, etc.
>

It's really hard to say. How would you compile it? Clang didn't come along
until 2007. The Amsterdam Compiler Kit, perhaps?

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20190106/233fdb17/attachment.html>


More information about the TUHS mailing list