<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">Pretty much, as it was the Plan 9 UTF man page at the time. This link will be essentially the same.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><a href="http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/6/utf">http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/6/utf</a><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">-rob</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 6:12 PM Mehdi Sadeghi <<a href="mailto:mehdi@mehdix.org">mehdi@mehdix.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="msg6889477001209331200">
  
    
    
  
  <div style="direction:ltr">
    <p>It's a long shot but is that appendix around by any chance?</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Mehdi</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div>On 3/22/23 03:52, Rob Pike wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">the
      paper had an appendix that described UTF-8's encoding rigorously,
      but that was dropped</blockquote>
  </div>

</div></blockquote></div>