<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hi,</p>
    <p>You can enjoy non-chopped up videos by replacing youtube.com by
      yewtu.be in related URLs (easiest way to remember).</p>
    <p>Or you can paste a youtube URL in the search box of any Invidious
      instance, like <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://invidious.fdn.fr">https://invidious.fdn.fr</a></p>
    <p>Other instances listed here in case one of them is down:
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://docs.invidious.io/instances/">https://docs.invidious.io/instances/</a><br>
    </p>
    <p>Sebastien</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 21/10/2023 à 18:40, John Cowan a
      écrit :<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAD2gp_R57NYpExt7jc1uvbXVV2JRUQ5OOVy4CNdyZp9rYaB_fg@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"times new
            roman",serif;font-size:large"><br>
          </div>
        </div>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at
            11:37 AM Paul Ruizendaal <<a href="mailto:pnr@planet.nl"
              moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">pnr@planet.nl</a>>
            wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
            An interesting set of videos indeed, although I wish they
            were not all chopped up in 5 minute segments.<br>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"times new
            roman",serif;font-size:large">The alternative nowadays
            is for YouTube to chop videos up themselves with
            commercials.</div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"times new
            roman",serif;font-size:large"><br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">The below site has a very
            nice summary of Xenix at Microsoft (I’ve linked it a couple
            of times before):<br>
            <a href="http://seefigure1.com/2014/04/15/xenixtime.html"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
              class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://seefigure1.com/2014/04/15/xenixtime.html</a></blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px
            solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote">By
            this time, there was growing retail demand for Xenix on
            IBM-compatible personal computer hardware, but Microsoft
            made the strategic decision not to sell Xenix in the
            consumer market; instead, they entered into an agreement
            with a company called the Santa Cruz Operation to package,
            sell and support Xenix for those customers.</blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"times new
            roman",serif;font-size:large">That's not entirely
            true.  The first personal computer I used was an IBM PC/AT,
            and I bought MS-branded Xenix (System III) for it.  It was a
            box full of floppies, and it came with the MS C compiler
            (CL.EXE etc.) which could compile for Xenix or cross-compile
            for MS-DOS.  That way I could write command-line programs on
            Xenix and deliver them for DOS.</div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"times new
            roman",serif;font-size:large"><br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> In a way it is the same
            dynamic that kept C89 and Bash in place for so long: people
            know it, it is good enough and it works everywhere.<br>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"times new
            roman",serif;font-size:large">C89 has plenty of obvious
            successors; bash does not.</div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"times new
            roman",serif;font-size:large"><br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Seeing the Cutler
            interviews reminded me of the old joke that there are only
            two operating systems left: Unix and VMS (Linux being
            Unix-family and Windows being VMS-family). <br>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"times new
            roman",serif;font-size:large">OS/360 (now in the form
            of z/OS) is still very much with us.  z/OS is
            Posix-certified, but it is fairly distant from Linux, *BSD,
            or Solaris.  (It is not to be confused with Linux running on
            System Z virtualized.)</div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>