moderation of alt.sources vs. automated harangues
Brandon S. Allbery
allbery at NCoast.ORG
Sun Nov 5 04:24:17 AEST 1989
Quoth lee at sq.com (Liam R. E. Quin) in <1989Nov2.033731.14704 at sq.sq.com>:
+---------------
| On the other hand, vaster than empires, the mighty Usenet slowly turns, and
| I would expect that changing the name of sources groups would irritate
| everyone who archived them.
+---------------
Which makes alt.sources a much better testing ground than comp.sources.* would
be. Or maybe we should create alt.source-code and let it run concurrently
with alt.sources, and observe the results. If it works well, it can be
proposed for the mainstream Usenet.
++Brandon
--
Brandon S. Allbery allbery at NCoast.ORG, BALLBERY (MCI Mail), ALLBERY (Delphi)
uunet!hal.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery ncoast!allbery at hal.cwru.edu bsa at telotech.uucp
*(comp.sources.misc mail to comp-sources-misc[-request]@backbone.site, please)*
*Third party vote-collection service: send mail to allbery at uunet.uu.net (ONLY)*
>>> The *.aquari* debate: news.groups gone news.playpen <<<
More information about the Alt.sources.d
mailing list