C News patch of 7-Sep-1990
Dean Brooks
dean at coplex.UUCP
Fri Sep 21 00:56:27 AEST 1990
henry at zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes:
>One of the reasons why we're reluctant to change our patch scheme is pure
>spleen against people who appear to be blindly prejudiced against it, as
>shown by the silly reasons they advance.
>- How do you know whether you have the latest C News patch? Well, how do
> you know whether you have the latest B News patch? Numbering/dating has
> nothing to do with it. Actually, dating is probably ahead here, since
> if you have last February's patch, you might suspect you are behind,
> while having patch 12 tells you nothing of the kind.
What? You are kidding right?
>D1. You cannot predict the name of a patch from the name of the previous
> patch. This can be troublesome when dealing with poorly-run
> software archives, which let you retrieve files but won't give
> you a list of available files.
The truth of the matter is that a large number of archives are not complete.
Since C-News hasn't been posted netwide in quite a while, most people are
relying on archives when upgrading to C-News from B.
In addition, the lXsXXarge number of patches becomes a problem as there is
no way of knowing
More information about the Comp.sources.bugs
mailing list