Can the address of a variable change during a function?
David Keppel
pardo at june.cs.washington.edu
Sun Nov 20 10:31:02 AEST 1988
Consider the following bit of C:
int
zorch()
{
int i, j;
j = 0;
bork (&i);
while (--i)
j += i;
splat (&i, &j);
j += i;
return (j);
}
Most current implementations will assign a location to each of i and
j at function declaration elaboration (e.g., when the function is
entered). I can imagine, however implementations in which the address
of a variable is not constant throughout the function (see below). In
this case, "bork" could squirrel away the pointer to 'i', and "splat"
could, say, read whatever is at the end of that 'squirreled away'
pointer. In this case, the behavior of the program will be *very*
different than if the variables had been declared with
auto int i;
int j;
In which case the address of 'i' passed to bork() and splat() is (I
think) guaranteed to be the same. I believe that the compiler is free
to implement the first bit of code as something like:
; i => r2
; j => r3
clear r3 ; j <- 0
move r2,-(sp) ; give i an address
move sp,r0 ; pass address of i
call bork
move (sp),r2 ; unspill i
L0:
dec r2 ; --i
br.leq L1
add r2,r3,r3 ; j += i
branch L0
L1:
move r3,(sp) ; give j i's old address
move sp,r0 ; pass address of j
move r2,-(sp) ; give i a new address
move sp,r1 ; pass address of i
call splat
add (sp),-4(sp),r0
sub #8,sp,sp ; patch up sp
return
I also belive that 'auto' has been removed from dpANS C.
Summarizing, the question is: "can a local parameter have several
addresses during one invocation of the function that it is declared
in?" All help is appreciated.
;-D on ( Who would have thunk it... ) Pardo
--
pardo at cs.washington.edu
{rutgers,cornell,ucsd,ubc-cs,tektronix}!uw-beaver!june!pardo
More information about the Comp.std.c
mailing list