>> Whirlwind II (built in 1952), was 16 bits. It took a long while for that
>> to become common wisdom.

> Now that goes back...

Yup. Before my time.  I didn't get to use it until 1954.

Doug

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:19 PM Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021, M Douglas McIlroy wrote:

> > I'm trying to get my head around a 10-bit machine optimised for C.
>
> How about 23-bits? That was one of the early ESS machines, evidently
> optimized to make every bit count. (Maybe a prime wordwidth helps with
> hashing?)

23 bits?  I think I'm about to throw up...  Yeah, being prime I suppose it
would help with hashing (and other crypto stuff).

> Whirlwind II (built in 1952), was 16 bits. It took a long while for that
> to become common wisdom.

Now that goes back...

-- Dave