All,
So... I've moved on from v7 to 2.11bsd - shucks, vi and tar and
co. just work there and everything else seems to be similar enough
for what I'm interested in anyway. So yay, I won't be pestering
y'all about vi anymore :). One the other hand, now I'm interested
in printing the docs.
Wimp .. ;-) seriously at this step, it might be easier for you as a more modern user.
2.11bsd comes with docs in, of all places, /usr/doc.
Well that is where is was in V7 ;-)
In there are
makefiles for making the docs - ok, make nroff will make ascii
docs, and troff will make troff? docs using Ossana's 'original'
troff.
So, after adding -t to it so it didn't complain about
'typesetter busy', I got no errors.
I mounted a tape, tar'ed my
.out file and untar'ed it on my macbook (did it for the nroff and
troff output). Then I hit the first snag, groff -Tps -ms troff.out
> whatever.ps resulted in cannot adjust line and cannot break
line errors and groff -Tps -ms nroff.out
> whatever.ps resulted in a bunch of double vision. I seem to
recall doing this in v6 and it working ok (at least for nroff).
Well let's just save -ms and troff itself were re-implemented and there are likely to be some small differences.
At UCB, the command would have been: tbl < input_troff_text | eqn | troff -t -ms | vcat
vcat(1) was the virtual CAT typesetter using a Versatec Plotter.
Adobe released a source-level product called transcript, that you recompiled and ran on V7 or later (like the PDP-11s). My memory it was ~ $1K back in the day. Transcript 2.0 contained a number of tools. One was a CAT to PS converter. Another was the tables for the ditroff to spit out PS so: ditroff -Tps worked as expected and a program called 'enscript' that converted from txt to PS.
All of these tools have modern FOSS equivalents, but it may take some hunting to find them. I think sources to transcript 2.0 can be found if you google around. I'm not sure Adobe ever officially made is FOSS, but after the modern equivalent showed up, I'm not aware of them minding that people did not have the license since it sold more printers with PostScript. That should just recompile on V7 or later and 'just work.' The modern equivalent might take some backporting.
BTW: Thinking about this, I believe I remember that there is a directory on Kirk's CD's that have a copy from UCB. Mount his disks and poke around. I'll try to look myself but I'm supposed to be helping my wife get ready for a socially distanced birthday party for our great-niece [we have the big back yard, tent et al that can handle the 6 foot part requirements].
My questions:
1. Is there a troff to postcript conversion utility present in a
stock 2.11 system (or even patch level 4xx system)?
The word "present"t is the operative term. Probably not.
2. Is there a way to build postscript directly on the system?
Yes, see above.
3. Is there an alternative modern way to get to ps or pdf output
from the nroff/troff that 2.11 has?
Yep - Ghostscript based tools which is what the Transcript replacements tend to use.
I'm still digging into the nroff stuff as that may be just minor
diffs between ancient nroff macros and "modern" macros or even
just errors (.sp -2 rather than .sp or .sp -1, .in -2 instead of
.in +2), etc.
Be careful - that's not quite the same. Basically groff fixed a number of long-standing issues that older troff/ditroff had worked around. Usually, the difference is that the original nroff/troff has some defaults that now need to make explicit. But most older *roff documents can go through modern groff just fine. The more typical error from old documents is a site that did not have a Versatec or later an Apple Laserwriter and only supported nroff. A number of documents when created for nroff will look ugly when you run them through any version of troff (old or new) as the document authors never took the time to deal with the differences in the output device.
Although, the files display ok in 2.11bsd using
nroff -ms nroff.out...
I would expect so. I bet they are fine with troff -t or if you can find ditroff (which also maybe on Kirk's CD) and then run the output through vcat or transcript. Note if you used vcat you will get some printing facsimiles that were there back in the day. The reason is when Tom Ferrin wrote vcat, the only fonts he had were the old Hershey fonts (fonts have gotten >>so<< much better since then). So troff is using Wang CAT4 typesetter font rules and Tim is doing the best he can to map that to Hershey. The PS CAT simulator in Transcript has the same issue BTW. It's a little better since the PS fonts are better but they don't map the 100%. However, if you use ditroff, Adobe supplied the rules in Transcript so that ditroff did its calculations using the proper fonts (Adobe's not Wang's).
Clem