5 May
2008
5 May
'08
1:01 p.m.
# bas
i=25
print i
2.50000000e1
for i = 1 10 print i next
1.00000000e0
2.00000000e0
3.00000000e0
4.00000000e0
5.00000000e0
6.00000000e0
7.00000000e0
8.00000000e0
9.00000000e0
1.00000000e1
So, that's asm, C, fortran, basic, and shell: 5 languages.
I'm sure we could get ed and roff to perform as turing machines, but
I will leave that as an exercise for the reader :-)
Warren
5 May
5 May
3:37 p.m.
Congratulations, folks! This is really neat stuff.
Brantley Coile
# bas
i=25
print i
2.50000000e1
for i = 1 10 print i next
1.00000000e0
2.00000000e0
3.00000000e0
4.00000000e0
5.00000000e0
6.00000000e0
7.00000000e0
8.00000000e0
9.00000000e0
1.00000000e1
So, that's asm, C, fortran, basic, and shell: 5 languages.
I'm sure we could get ed and roff to perform as turing machines, but
I will leave that as an exercise for the reader :-)
Warren
_______________________________________________
Unix-jun72 mailing list
Unix-jun72(a)minnie.tuhs.org
https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/unix-jun72
7:14 p.m.
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 11:01:09PM +1000, Warren Toomey wrote:
So, that's asm, C, fortran, basic, and shell: 5
languages.
Very good.
I'm sure we could get ed and roff to perform as
turing machines, but
I will leave that as an exercise for the reader :-)
http://www.kernelthread.com/hanoi/html/troff.html
Shortening the variable names will make it compatible with old
{n,t}roff but I'm not sure what else might be different in v1.
BTW: The mailing list currently has a 'From: <unix-jun72(a)tuhs.org>' and
'Reply-To: <unix-jun72(a)minnie.tuhs.org>' - shouldn't these be the
same?
--
Peter Jeremy
Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement
an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
5833
days inactive
5833
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Brantley Coile -
Peter Jeremy -
Warren Toomey