[COFF] OSI stack
Grant Taylor
gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net
Fri Feb 8 12:41:54 AEST 2019
On 2/7/19 12:28 PM, Michael Kjörling wrote:
> While different, I think that the introduction of the more advanced
> IPv6 address formats into DNS also qualifies. I don't recall off hand if
> bit-string labels (which were used for reverse lookups) or the A6 RRtype
> (for forward lookups) was the more problematic one, but I do recall that
> both had issues that made real-world adoption non-trivial in the best
> of cases.
Middle boxes that (mis)interpret DNS traffic are still a problem.
Admittedly less of a problem. I suspect even less after the DNS Flag
Day we recently had.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4008 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/coff/attachments/20190207/92250663/attachment.bin>
More information about the COFF
mailing list