[COFF] OSI stack

Grant Taylor gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net
Fri Feb 8 12:41:54 AEST 2019


On 2/7/19 12:28 PM, Michael Kjörling wrote:
> While different, I think that the introduction of the more advanced 
> IPv6 address formats into DNS also qualifies. I don't recall off hand if 
> bit-string labels (which were used for reverse lookups) or the A6 RRtype 
> (for forward lookups) was the more problematic one, but I do recall that 
> both had issues that made real-world adoption non-trivial in the best 
> of cases.

Middle boxes that (mis)interpret DNS traffic are still a problem. 
Admittedly less of a problem.  I suspect even less after the DNS Flag 
Day we recently had.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4008 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/coff/attachments/20190207/92250663/attachment.bin>


More information about the COFF mailing list