[COFF] [TUHS] ksh88 source code?

[Adam Thornton]

MacOS finally pushed me to zsh.  So I went all the way and installed
oh-my-zsh.  It makes me feel very dirty, and I have a two-line prompt (!!),
but I can't deny it's convenient.

tickets/DM-32983 ✗
adam at m1-wired:~/git/jenkins-dm-jobs$

(and in my terminal, the X glyph next to my git branch showing the status
is dirty is red while the branch name is green)

and if something doesn't exit with rc=0...

adam at m1-wired:~/git/jenkins-dm-jobs$ fart
zsh: command not found: fart
tickets/DM-32983 ✗127 ⚠️
adam at m1-wired:~/git/jenkins-dm-jobs$

Then I also get the little warning glyph and the rc of the last command in
my prompt.

But then I'm also now using Fira Code with ligatures in my terminal, so
I've pretty much gone full Red Lightsaber.

Adam

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 7:41 AM Norman Wilson <norman at oclsc.org> wrote:

> Thomas Paulsen:
>
>   bash is clearly more advanced. ksh is retro computing.
>
> ====
>
> Shell wars are, in the end, no more interesting than editor wars.
>
> I use bash on Linux systems because it's the least-poorly
> supported of the Bourne-family shells, besides which bash
> is there by default.  Ksh isn't.
>
> I use ksh on OpenBSD systems because it's the least-poorly
> supported of the Bourne-family shells, besides which kh
> is there by default.  Bash isn't.
>
> I don't actually care for most of the extra crap in either
> of those shells.  I don't want my shell to do line editing
> or auto-completion, and I find the csh-derived history
> mechanisms more annoying than useful so I turn them off
> too.  To my mind, the Research 10/e sh had it about right,
> including the simple way functions were exported and the
> whatis built-in that told you whether something was a
> variable or a shell function or an external executable,
> and printed the first two in forms easily edited on the
> screen and re-used.
>
> Terminal programs that don't let you easily edit input
> or output from the screen and re-send it, and programs
> that abet them by spouting gratuitous ANSI control
> sequences: now THAT's what I call retro-computing.
>
> Probably further discussion of any of this belongs in
> COFF.
>
> Norman Wilson
> Toronto ON
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/coff/attachments/20211222/739b6617/attachment.htm>