[TUHS] SCO sues IBM?
peter.jeremy at alcatel.com.au
Tue Mar 11 10:22:03 AEST 2003
On 2003-Mar-11 10:15:48 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog at lemis.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, 11 March 2003 at 8:15:18 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>I think you mean me, not Warren. Warren hasn't said anything yet.
Oops. Sorry about that. "My mind is going... I can feel it, Dave"
>My concern is not whether it's genuine--I'm convinced it is. My
>concern is more whether SCO's apparently bone-headed lawyers will
>believe it's genuine.
Taking the devil's advocate position, if my lawyers were convinced
that I'm made a particular statement, based solely on a piece of
e-mail given to them by my competition, I'd be in the market for
some new lawyers.
>> Whilst you could probably prove the authenticity of the e-mail, this
>> would cost real money - and SCO probably can afford to spend a lot
>> more money than you can.
>It's not clear how much money SCO has.
Probably more than you or I do...
>I am very sure that IBM has not put any UNIX code into Linux.
I'd be very surprised at this as well. It would open a legal minefield.
More information about the TUHS