[Unix-jun72] organization of fs tree

Warren Toomey wkt at tuhs.org
Mon May 12 08:00:36 AEST 2008

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:44:50AM -1000, Tim Newsham wrote:
> The new boot stuff that James provided has more fs/usr files.  How
> do we want to organize this in the tree?  Do we just mix it with the
> fs2 bits?  Do we enter it as part of the new bits?

I'd argue: if it's known original bits, put it in fs/. If it's a full
or partial reconstruction, put it in fs/new. That way we can tell what's
original and what's not.


More information about the TUHS mailing list