[Unix-jun72] Early UNIX: papers & Usenix
Warren Toomey
wkt at tuhs.org
Sat Apr 11 08:28:39 AEST 2009
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:23:19PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Do the Net-2-derived BSDs (including Darwin) really count as Unix-derived?
> I thought they were fairly free of AT&T code now, other than headers and
> the like. Conceptually, of course, they are Unix-derived, but then so
> is Linux.
I count "derived" as meaning that I can trace a continuous code lineage from one
to the other. So V7 -> 32V -> 3BSD -> 4.xBSD -> 4.4BSD-Lite -> Open Src BSDs.
But Linux isn't derived, in this sense.
> It would be snazzy to restore the classical typography of Unix as
> U<small>NIX</small> in your paper.
I'm following the official trademark. I must admit that I dithered in each
direction, but then decided to stick to the official, blessed version of
the typography.
Glad you guys liked the paper.
Warren
More information about the TUHS
mailing list