[TUHS] why the leading under score added to function names?
dave at horsfall.org
Thu Feb 23 07:22:17 AEST 2012
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, arnold at skeeve.com wrote:
> This is interesting. It shows that (apparently) early on, assembler was
> viewed as the primary programming language.
Well, C didn't exactly spring from Zeus's brow :-) A good chunk of the
C library was in assembler, as were quite a number of programs.
> It also shows the consequences a small, apparently local decision can have:
> here we are 40+ years later and GCC on Windows is still preprending
> underscores to function names!
When it comes to Windoze, nothing surprises me any more. Unix has evolved
over the years, but Windoze was spat out and hatched.
More information about the TUHS