Hi Larry, > Instead we have uint64_t and I don't see the added value of more > chars. The `_t' suffix plonks them in the area that POSIX has reserved so if they do clash with existing ones that's the user's fault. Perhaps they felt the `uint' was still short enough and containing `int' was mnemonic. -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy