[TUHS] Why Linux not another PC/UNIX [was Mach for i386 ...]

[Chet Ramey]

On 2/22/17 12:00 PM, Clem Cole wrote:

> But you are right .. no one was really sure what was going to happen.   So
> the BSD/386 iso's were hidden, so at least officially they could say the
> only people that we supposed to have access were the BSD licensees.   But
> as I say it was a well known "secret." 

This has very much the aura of a private club.  If you were in the club,
the secret was well known, but most of the people who went to Linux and
supported its growth were not.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet at case.edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/