[TUHS] 3330s, 3340s, Winchesters... (was: /dev/drum)
Greg 'groggy' Lehey
grog at lemis.com
Wed Apr 25 10:52:51 AEST 2018
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 9:13:41 -0400, Clem Cole wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Paul Winalski <paul.winalski at gmail.com>
>> Clem claims that the code name refers to various advances in
>> disk technology first released in the 3330's disk packs. Wikipedia
>> and my own memory agree with you that Winchester referred to the 3340.
> ???Interesting ... My source was (is) my friend and former colleague from
> Stellar, Russ Robelen, ???who was the HW lead for the 360/50 and the IBM ACS
> systems. Russ said the original IBM project Winchester first begat the
> platter (as Noel pointed out was so named because of the 30-30 capacity of
> the original disk) - which showed up in the 3330 disks as well as the
> sealed head stuff that Paul and Greg are talking about.
Hmm. The earliest 3330s had 100 MB per disk, considerably more than
the 3340. I had thought that the 3340 had fewer surfaces. And the
3330s definitely only had one disk per unit, though they brought out
an 8-drive cabinet with a whopping 2.4 GB (by the time I used them).
> What I never asked him, was where Memorex fit it. It was a somehow
> a joint project with them, and they got at least some of the
> technology -- in fact DEC's OEM for the RP05/RP06 was Memorex [the
> big box of logic on the side of the DEC version was the Massbus to
> IBM I/O logic converter]. It is also true that real lasting piece
> of project Winchester was the embedded (sealed head) stuff that came
> from the 3340.
Yesterday I suggested that CDC might have used the same disk packs as
the 3330, but I'm now very sure that the ones we used came from Ampex.
> I should ask Russ what he remembers, on this.
It would also be interesting to hear if he can shed any light on the
Winchester Boulevard vs. 30/30 controversy.
Sent from my desktop computer.
Finger grog at lemis.com for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program
reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the TUHS