usotsuki at buric.co
Mon Apr 30 02:34:49 AEST 2018
On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> Right. The I think we're on the same page. I won't comment further on the x86
> which I mentioned before, since I think we can all agree that that one is
> really brain damaged.
I'm not sure whether the 65C816 might actually be *more* brain-damaged in
its segmentation than the 8088. That said, I suspect the 8088 is worse
because of the bitshift.
More information about the TUHS