[TUHS] Who used *ROFF?
Clem cole
clemc at ccc.com
Tue May 15 01:04:36 AEST 2018
Thinking about this typesetter C may have been later with ditroff.
Sent from my PDP-7 Running UNIX V0 expect things to be almost but not quite.
> On May 14, 2018, at 10:45 AM, Clem cole <clemc at ccc.com> wrote:
>
> Runoff from other systems begat Unix roff. Which begat new roff - aka nroff. both assume an ASR 37 as the output device. When the first typesetter was procured typesetter roff aka troff, was born which assumes the C/A/T as the output device (which is a binary format). This is also were typesetter C comes from. Note these are 3 separate and different programs although nroff and troff mostly take the same input language. These were included in V5/6/7 IIRC
>
>
>
> When newer typesetters were obtained and after the death of troff’s author, Brian rewrote the nroff/troff package to create ditroff- device independent typesetter roff which also could support ASCII output nroff style
>
> This version was released independently of the OS and took a separate license.
>
> Ditroff was reimplemented by Clark (IIRC) to create today’s groff which takes mostly a superset of the ditroff input language.
>
> Sent from my PDP-7 Running UNIX V0 expect things to be almost but not quite.
>
>>> On May 14, 2018, at 8:41 AM, Dave Horsfall <dave at horsfall.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 14 May 2018, Doug McIlroy wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's part of the story.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> You mentioned "nroff" a few times; would it not have been "troff" for their C/A/T photo-typesetter? At least, that was the lore that I heard...
>>
>> And what was "C/A/T" anyway (assuming that my memory is not failing me)?
>>
>> -- Dave
More information about the TUHS
mailing list