[TUHS] A question about ls(1)

Bakul Shah bakul at bitblocks.com
Mon Apr 29 02:15:16 AEST 2019

On Apr 28, 2019, at 4:47 AM, Dan Cross <crossd at gmail.com> wrote:
> I suspect the "dot file" convention came later, as a side-effect of observed behavior of ls.

This could’ve been avoided if there was a convention about
where to store per user per app settings & possibly state. On
one of my Unix machines I have over 200 dotfiles. 

More information about the TUHS mailing list