[TUHS] Were cron and at done at the same time? Or one before the other?

Steffen Nurpmeso steffen at sdaoden.eu
Thu Dec 10 09:51:33 AEST 2020

Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
 <20201209234435.CmOyp%steffen at sdaoden.eu>:
 |Bakul Shah wrote in
 | <E204EAE4-3D80-4774-BC62-CD6678EF884B at iitbombay.org>:
 ||On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:06 AM, Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso at mit.edu> wrote:
 ||> If you want to see a system that was more thoroughly _designed_, you
 ||>   should probably point not to Dennis and Ken, but to systems like \
 ||>   L4 and
 ||>   Plan-9, and people like Jochen Liedtk and Rob Pike.
 ||>   And notice how they aren't all that popular or well known? "Design" is
 ||>   like a religion - too much of it makes you inflexibly and unpopular.
 ||I recently read an article that says in biology the “neutral
 ||theory” (random chance has a profound effect on genetics and
 ||evolution) is much more accepted now than Darwin & Wallace’s
 |Eh.  What these guys want is to push through "green" genetics with
 |massive lobby work.  Your head is a toilet and those masses of
 |lobbyists throw their diarrhoea on to you regardless.
 |"Indifference has won won won".

Of course: i have no idea, please listen to the specialists who

|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

More information about the TUHS mailing list