[TUHS] reviving a bit of WWB

[Clem Cole]

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 4:59 PM Steve Nickolas <usotsuki at buric.co> wrote:

> I was under the impression that there was explicitly no requirement that a
> null pointer be 0,
>
Indeed, section 7.19 states it is *implementation-defined*.  See my
previous message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20200920/929b80a9/attachment.htm>