[TUHS] AIX repeat [was Re: Zombified SCO comes back from the dead, brings trial back to life against IBM
Charles H Sauer
sauer at technologists.com
Sat Apr 3 03:17:10 AEST 2021
I'm not sure that I have anything to add beyond repeating citation to
It credits ISC and LCC appropriately.
AIX involvement with SCO, if any, would have been after I left IBM. I
find it hard to imagine what that involvement would have been.
On 4/2/2021 11:03 AM, Clem Cole wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 11:54 PM Wesley Parish <wobblygong at gmail.com
> <mailto:wobblygong at gmail.com>> wrote:
> I don't think anybody was even thinking of porting any of
> the *BSD to IBM mainframes till much later, am I right?
> No. BSD was very much on IBM's radar in the late 1970s and 1980s.
> Long before Linus released Linux into the wild in 1990 for the >>386<<
> much less any other ISA, IBM had been shipping as a product AIX/370 (and
> AIX/PS2 for the 386); which we developed at Locus for them. The
> user-space was mostly System V, the kernel was based on BSD (4.1
> originally) pluis a great deal of customization, including of course the
> Locus OS work, which IBM called TCF - the transparent computing
> facility. It was very cool you could cluster 370s and PS/2 and from
> >>any<< node run a program of either ISA. It has been well discussed
> in this forum, previously.
> A for AIX/370 a quick history which Charlie can fill in more from the
> IBM side, was that in the last 60s and early 70s, IBM had a strange hold
> on the education/research market with the S/360; but lost it because of
> the lack of timesharing to DEC and PDP-10 based systems as IBM was more
> and more focused on the commercial sector where there was much more
> money to be made. But ... there was a drive in the IBM
> educational/research team to be able to reenter that market and Locus
> was hired to develop AIX/370 (and later PS2) as it was felt that UNIX
> was considered an important offering for those customers. After it was
> released as a product, it turned out purchasing AIX/370 was exceedingly
> difficult (for a number of reasons), although it was extremely well
> received by those that ran it, but getting it was difficult. In fact, I
> have been told by folks that there at the time, that using TCF was an
> important feature here at Intel for the success of the simulation for
> the 486 and Pentium.
> Again, Charlie can tell you the history but IBM also developed AIX for
> the RS/6000 which was the same OS (only different) from IBM Austin(no
> TCF, but supported DS which was cool in its own right). Locus was
> actually contracted to develop a UNIX subsystem for the AS/400 also, but
> I'm not sure if that ever shipped. I had left Locus and hadgoneto DEC
> by then.
voice: +1.512.784.7526 e-mail: sauer at technologists.com
fax: +1.512.346.5240 Web: https://technologists.com/sauer/
More information about the TUHS