[TUHS] Is it time to resurrect the original dsw (delete with switches)?
John Dow
johnmdow at me.com
Mon Aug 30 19:14:15 AEST 2021
On 30/08/2021 00:09, Henry Bent wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 at 18:13, Jon Steinhart <jon at fourwinds.com
> <mailto:jon at fourwinds.com>> wrote:
>
> I recently upgraded my machines to fc34. I just did a stock
> uncomplicated installation using the defaults and it failed miserably.
>
> Fc34 uses btrfs as the default filesystem so I thought that I'd
> give it
> a try.
>
>
> ... cut out a lot about how no sane person would want to use btrfs ...
>
>
> Or, as Saturday Night Live might put it: And now, linux, starring the
> not ready for prime time filesystem. Seems like something that's been
> under development for around 15 years should be in better shape.
>
>
> To my way of thinking this isn't a Linux problem, or even a btrfs
> problem, it's a Fedora problem. They're the ones who decided to
> switch their default filesystem to something that clearly isn't ready
> for prime time.
This. Even the Arch wiki makes it clear that btrfs isn't ready for prime
time. It's still under very heavy development - not really something you
want for a filesystem, particularly one storing a large amount of
critical data.
John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20210830/3e22fe1d/attachment.htm>
More information about the TUHS
mailing list