[TUHS] Ratfor revived!
Deborah Scherrer
dscherrer at solar.stanford.edu
Fri Dec 3 04:34:45 AEST 2021
Oh no, the Georgia Tech guys were heavily involved with the Software
Tools stuff at Lawrence Berkeley Lab. Were in frequent contact. Did a
superb job of setting up the Tools there and extending them. Good guys!
Debbie
On 12/1/21 11:41 PM, arnold at skeeve.com wrote:
> Indeed.
>
> I never worked with this directly, though. I went to grad school
> at Georgia Tech, where some of the students had started with the tools
> from the book and built a beautiful Unix-like subsystem on top of
> Primos on Pr1me minicomputers. (This code was recoverd in 2019,
> after thinking it'd been lost for 30+ years!)
>
> I never asked, but I suspect that the Georgia Tech guys simply didn't
> know about the LBL work, or else they developed in parallel.
>
> Arnold
>
> Deborah Scherrer <dscherrer at solar.stanford.edu> wrote:
>
>> All you folks revisiting the Software Tools should remember that there
>> was an entire movement around the first book, based at Lawrence Berkeley
>> Lab. The Software Tools group, an offshoot of Usenix, had about 2000
>> members. We created an almost-entire Unix environment based on a
>> virtual operating system that we designed, inspired of course by
>> Kernighan's ideas. The collection was ported to over 50 operating
>> systems, including some without file systems. This is all still freely
>> available, and stored with the Unix archives.
>>
>> Deborah
>>
>> On 12/1/21 12:59 PM, Clem Cole wrote:
>>> Arnold -- sounds fun. Thank you!!! I'll add it to my growing pile of
>>> things I want to play with at some point. I too had a wonderful
>>> childhood experience with the SW tools. Somebody had a number of them
>>> running on a VMS box when all we had was the VMS Fortran compiler, no
>>> C yet.
>>>
>>> I am curious why did you decide to use byacc? I would have thought
>>> in a desire to modernize and make it more available on a modern system
>>> -- was there something in byacc that could not be done easily in
>>> bison? To be honest, I had thought Robert Corbett did them both and
>>> bison was the successor to byacc, but I'm not a compiler guy - so I'm
>>> suspecting that there must be a difference/reason. As I said, this
>>> is purely curiosity -- an educational opportunity.
>>>
>>> Thanks again,
>>> Clem
>>> ᐧ
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:41 PM Arnold Robbins <arnold at skeeve.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All.
>>>
>>> Mainly for fun (sic), I decided to revive the Ratfor (Rational
>>> Fortran) preprocessor. Please see:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/arnoldrobbins/ratfor
>>>
>>> I started with the V6 code, then added the V7, V8 and V10 versions
>>> on top of it. Each one has its own branch so that you can look
>>> at the original code, if you wish. The man page and the paper from
>>> the V7 manual are also included.
>>>
>>> Starting with the Tenth Edition version, I set about to modernize
>>> the code and get it to compile and run on a modern-day system.
>>> (ANSI style declarations and function headers, modern include files,
>>> use of getopt, and most importantly, correct use of Yacc yyval and
>>> yylval variables.)
>>>
>>> You will need Berkely Yacc installed as byacc in order to build it.
>>>
>>> I have only touch-tested it, but so far it seems OK. 'make' runs
>>> in like 2
>>> seconds, really quick. On my Ubuntu Linux systems, it compiles with
>>> no warnings.
>>>
>>> I hope to eventually add a test suite also, if I can steal some time.
>>>
>>> Before anyone asks, no, I don't think anybody today has any real use
>>> for it. This was simply "for fun", and because Ratfor has a soft
>>> spot in my heart. "Software Tools" was, for me, the most influential
>>> programming book that I ever read. I don't think there's a better
>>> book to convey the "zen" of Unix.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Arnold
>>>
More information about the TUHS
mailing list