[TUHS] [tuhs] The Unix shell: a 50-year view
Clem Cole
clemc at ccc.com
Mon Jul 5 13:03:43 AEST 2021
Right. A dyslexic typo sorry doesn’t
That was my point. He needed a tool and didn’t have one so he wrote a
singular tool to solve the problem. We now consider that tool pretty much
standard equipment
On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 10:51 PM Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2021, 8:39 PM Clem Cole <clemc at ccc.com> wrote:
>
>> Noel. Pls check the TUHS archives and I think you will see sed does yet
>> exist in 6th edition when Joy wrote head in 1977. Certainly not yet at
>> UCB.
>>
>
> V6 doesn't have sed.
>
> Warner
>
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 9:34 PM Noel Hunt <noel.hunt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > But note that when wnj wrote head(1), Joy followed the
>>> > famous `Unix Philosophy' of doing one (small) job
>>> > well. Which means he did not add a feature *i.e.*
>>> > abusing, an old program, like cat(1), and add some new
>>> > switch to it that that told the program stop outputting
>>> > after n lines. Instead Joy wrote a simple new tool.
>>>
>>> He didn't need to abuse any existing program by adding new
>>> flags or the like; unless I am mistaken, `sed Nq', for some
>>> number `N', does exactly what `head -N' would do on a single
>>> file, obviating the very need for head(1).
>>>
>>>> --
>> Sent from a handheld expect more typos than usual
>>
> --
Sent from a handheld expect more typos than usual
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20210704/7573482b/attachment.htm>
More information about the TUHS
mailing list