[TUHS] FD 2
Clem Cole
clemc at ccc.com
Tue Jan 31 07:10:14 AEST 2023
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 3:39 PM Theodore Ts'o <tytso at mit.edu> wrote:
> apparently representatives from System V derivatives
> seemed to have a dominant role on the POSIX committee.
>
I can personally attest (having been in the room during many of that
those discussions) this is a true statement.
The early versions (certainly thru .1 - the original system called
Interface), AT&T team, and a number of vendors particularly the European
ones - tried hard to push the SVID to be POSIX, although many of us
had used a lot of BSD in our systems fought back. Can not say it was a fun
time. The problem was everyone in the room wanted to be the big dog and to
have all the food -- no one could really admit that we were all in it
together and the real competition was elsewhere.
FWIW: Keith Bostic occasionally came to some of those meetings from CSRG to
some of those meetings and was amazingly gracious/patient. It's why 4.4
had a number of things in that made it closer to POSIX.
ᐧ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20230130/077cdf5f/attachment.htm>
More information about the TUHS
mailing list