[TUHS] SCCS, TeamWare, BitKeeper, and Git

Greg A. Woods woods at robohack.ca
Wed Dec 18 08:28:19 AEST 2024


Thank you very much for your reply Marc.

One thing I left unstated in my question, and indeed in my 1988 question
as well, was more or less:  "If vc is just a macro processor, why might
I want to use it instead of any other available macro processor?"

Indeed that was an even more important question back then before there
was an open-source version of SCCS (with vc).  Back in 1988 I only had
access to a public SunOS machine, a public SCO Xenix machine, and
whatever Unix(-like) machines might be available at my current
workplace, and of course not all of them might have had SCCS installed.
As a C programmer I was already familiar with CPP of course, and having
been a Unix user since my earliest university courses I was also
familiar, at least in passing in 1988, with M4.  (One year later I had
my own little AT&T 3B2/400 running UNIX System V with SCCS!)

Having now finally read more about M6 thanks to your link to a copy of
CSTR#2, I see that vc is moderately more like M6 than M4 in its
simplicity, and as such it might be simpler to use in some contexts.

--
					Greg A. Woods <gwoods at acm.org>

Kelowna, BC     +1 250 762-7675           RoboHack <woods at robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods at planix.com>     Avoncote Farms <woods at avoncote.ca>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP Digital Signature
URL: <http://www.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20241217/2d147ad7/attachment.sig>


More information about the TUHS mailing list