[TUHS] Building programs (Re: Version 256 of systemd boasts '42% less Unix philosophy' The Register

[Chet Ramey via TUHS]

On 6/23/24 4:15 PM, Stuff Received wrote:

> My opinion is that the authors simply did not have access to other systems 
> or were not interested.  Sometimes, one finds a disclaimer to that effect.  
> I understand that but I am irked when they claim POSIX compliance.

These are not at all the same. "POSIX compliance," from an application's
perspective, means that the application behaves the way POSIX says it
should for the behaviors POSIX standardizes. That doesn't have much to do
with the author's implementation choices or whether or not the
application runs on arbitrary systems.


-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet at case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20240624/ff7897c9/attachment.sig>