[TUHS] Off topic: Does anyone know what's going on with the PCC Revived project?

[Steve Nickolas]

On Sun, 25 May 2025, Luther Johnson wrote:

> Besides which x86 or other machine models you want, and how much of which 
> sort of optimization is enough, the other challenge is which C language 
> variant, exactly, you want. Simple C compilers that do one thing well, often, 
> well, do just one of these things.

And if like me you're mainly wanting to create a free (open, libre) 
replacement for Turbo C 2.0 or Microsoft C 5.1, a basic C89 compiler 
targetting MS-DOS (yeah, going a bit more OT here) as a main goal, it 
should be easy to ignore a lot of the usual rules because you can target 
an existing assembler that will do a lot of the work for you...as x86 
macro assemblers to have a fair bit of stuff specifically to support C.

-uso.