[TUHS] History of cal(1)?
Bakul Shah via TUHS
tuhs at tuhs.org
Tue Sep 23 13:57:46 AEST 2025
Things get quite complicated when you have lunisolar calendars!
An extra lunar month is added every 32 or 33 lunar months to sync
up with the solar cycle[1]. In India they have been in use for
many centuries and even today most religious festivals and events
follow them. Here's a typical calendar page[2]:
https://www.prokerala.com/general/calendar/hinducalendar.php?year=2025&mon=september&sb=1#calendar
As you can see plenty of information is imparted[3]. When I was
a kid, we would always get a day-per-page calendar every year
because of this.
[1] One's birthday as per Indian & Greorian calendars lines up almost
exactly every 19 years.
[2] Not sure what software they use. The calendar also changes based
on your location!
[3] Things like sunrise/sunset, the zodiac moon is passing through,
etc. Details explained here:
https://www.anaadi.org/post/indian-calendar-part-3-the-panchangam
> On Sep 22, 2025, at 6:50 PM, Rob Pike via TUHS <tuhs at tuhs.org> wrote:
>
> There are so many calendars in the world. The Muslim calendar. The Jewish
> calendar. The Mayan calendar. Countless indigenous calendars too, I am
> certain.
>
> Whenever computing butts up against real human culture, things get messy
> fast. No point in trying to catalog the mess exhaustively.
>
> -rob
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 11:14 AM Steffen Nurpmeso via TUHS <tuhs at tuhs.org>
> wrote:
>
>> John Levine via TUHS wrote in
>> <20250923003454.03671DD56E9A at ary.qy>:
>> |It appears that Douglas McIlroy via TUHS <douglas.mcilroy at dartmouth.edu>
>> \
>> |said:
>> |>> [cal(1)] has all the logic to adjust for 16th century
>> |>> calendar changes ... (Try "cal 9 1752")
>> |>> My impression is that [it is] overimplemented.
>> |>
>> |>The fact that a 16th century change is illustrated by an 18th century
>> |>example suggests that not quite "all the logic" is there. It's good
>> |>for Great Britain and its colonies, but not elsewhere. So I'd say it's
>> |>underimplemented :)
>> |
>> |You'll be relieved to know that ncal has addressed that omission:
>> |
>> |$ ncal -p
>> | AL Albania 1912-11-30 IS Iceland 1700-11-16
>> | AT Austria 1583-10-05 IT Italy 1582-10-04
>> | AU Australia 1752-09-02 JP Japan 1918-12-18
>> | BE Belgium 1582-12-14 LT Lithuania 1918-02-01
>> | BG Bulgaria 1916-03-31 LU Luxembourg 1582-12-14
>> | CA Canada 1752-09-02 LV Latvia 1918-02-01
>> | CH Switzerland 1655-02-28 NL Netherlands 1582-12-14
>> | CN China 1911-12-18 NO Norway 1700-02-18
>> | CZ Czech Republic 1584-01-06 PL Poland 1582-10-04
>> | DE Germany 1700-02-18 PT Portugal 1582-10-04
>>
>> (In an earlier thread on this topic Mr. McIlroy threw into
>> the discussion that for example Germany was very much more
>> complicated than that. And i said iirc something like "we
>> tried to keep it local by then" [actually notoriously so], and
>> unfortunately talked about Mors Teutonicus even, as "we more
>> usually than not reached the Holy Land" before reaching the holy
>> land, which *possibly* is the only one and true way to reach the
>> holy land .. if you can. (Pffffhh, what a talk.))
>>
>> | DK Denmark 1700-02-18 RO Romania 1919-03-31
>> | ES Spain 1582-10-04 RU Russia 1918-01-31
>> | FI Finland 1753-02-17 SI Slovenia 1919-03-04
>> | FR France 1582-12-09 SE Sweden 1753-02-17
>> | GB United Kingdom 1752-09-02 TR Turkey 1926-12-18
>> | GR Greece 1924-03-09 *US United States 1752-09-02
>> | HU Hungary 1587-10-21 YU Yugoslavia 1919-03-04
>> |
>> |R's,
>> |John
>> |
>> |PS: my point was not that it's a lot of code, but that is's a
>> distinctive \
>> |hack so one might
>> |look at earlier calendar programs to see whether they also did it to \
>> |try and trace the
>> |chain of influence.
>> --End of <20250923003454.03671DD56E9A at ary.qy>
>>
>> --steffen
>> |
>> |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
>> |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
>> |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
>> |(By Robert Gernhardt)
>>
More information about the TUHS
mailing list