The Unix Heritage Society

Warren Toomey wkt at
Mon Aug 3 11:50:42 AEST 1998

In article by Greg Lehey:
> On Sunday,  2 August 1998 at 18:28:56 -0700, David C. Jenner wrote:
> > I think he has a point here:
> >
> >   Restrict it to whatever the Ancient Unix license from SCO
> >   (and any equivalent licenses yet to emerge) covers.  In fact,
> >   an objective could be to try to ADD more systems from vendors
> >   (like Venix, even Xenix) who required the AT&T license.
> That's rather conservative, isn't it?  If we had done that previously,
> there would never now have been an SCO licence for 16 bit UNIX.  If we
> do it now, there will never be a license for 32 bit UNIX.

Keep it to systems which require a UNIX source license, then?


Received: (from major at localhost)
	by (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA12118
	for pups-liszt; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 11:53:44 +1000 (EST)

More information about the TUHS mailing list