The Unix Society
David C. Jenner
djenner at halcyon.com
Mon Aug 3 12:41:58 AEST 1998
I don't think I'm saying what you think I said? I not trying to
restrict it to nothing, or even not 32-bit.
But then it's Sunday night here, and Monday morning there, so maybe
I'm not clear about what I said!?
Dave
Greg Lehey wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 2 August 1998 at 18:28:56 -0700, David C. Jenner wrote:
> > I think he has a point here:
> >
> > Restrict it to whatever the Ancient Unix license from SCO
> > (and any equivalent licenses yet to emerge) covers. In fact,
> > an objective could be to try to ADD more systems from vendors
> > (like Venix, even Xenix) who required the AT&T license.
>
> That's rather conservative, isn't it? If we had done that previously,
> there would never now have been an SCO licence for 16 bit UNIX. If we
> do it now, there will never be a license for 32 bit UNIX.
>
> Greg
Received: (from major at localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA12306
for pups-liszt; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:45:16 +1000 (EST)
More information about the TUHS
mailing list