SCO Source license tainting?
grog at lemis.com
Wed Feb 24 10:46:07 AEST 1999
On Wednesday, 24 February 1999 at 8:52:15 +1100, Warren Toomey wrote:
> In article by Jesper Nilsson:
>> I'm thinking about getting myself a SCO Source license,
>> but I'm worried that I might get "tainted" by this
>> since my day job involves writing operating systems...
>> My employer would not appreciate getting sued because of
>> my hobbies...:-)
> As long as you don't reuse tainted Unix source code in your job, you will
> be ok. There are so many books covering the Unix kernel: Lions, Bach,
> Goodheart, Vahalia etc., that any concerns other than source code reuse
> are negligible.
I think this relates to a spectre raised during the USL/BSDI wars.
Somebody suggested that anybody who had been exposed to AT&T source
code was ``tainted'' and could thus not legally develop competitive
systems. Somewhere I have a button that somebody brought back to me
from a USENIX, with the text ``mentally contaminated''.
Jesper, I don't think you need to worry about the problem. That kind
of restriction would be unenforceable.
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger grog at lemis.com for PGP public key
More information about the TUHS