[TUHS] UVM VM system
akosela at andykosela.com
Sun Sep 2 16:29:42 AEST 2018
On Saturday, September 1, 2018, Clem Cole <clemc at ccc.com> wrote:
>> Has FreeBSD considered this?
> Last I knew, no. I was under the impression, the work FreeBSD did
> rewriting the Mach stuff paid off for them at the time. I have FreeBSD,
> OpenBSD and Linux (and Mac OSx) all running on my systems here. But the
> problem is that the HW is all over the map in termns of release date, so
> I'm not sure which is faster at this point. The *BSD systems are the
> easiest to admin and clean/simplest (which is why they only systems I have
> exposed is an OpenBSD box).
OpenBSD is also using uvm. But these days it certainly differs from
NetBSD implementation as it was hacked on by different people during the
last several years.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the TUHS