TUHS

tuhs@tuhs.org

26 participants
6495 discussions

by Warren Toomey

All, Dennis has just passed to me the source to a UNIX kernel around the 3rd Edition (i.e around 1973). He says this is the oldest machine-readable UNIX source he has. I've just placed it in the PUPS archive at: Distributions/research/Dennis_v3 Cheers, Warren

26 years, 4 months

My mail screw-up

by mxs46＠k2.scl.cwru.edu

Hello everyone, Sorry for being away from the list lately, the machine I was doing my E-mail on (harrier.Uznet.NET) has been down for several days, and I have to assume that it's down forever. I have moved my mail back to my old address <mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu>. If any of you have sent any mail to msokolov(a)harrier.Uznet.NET in the past several days, please resend it to mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu, since harrier.Uznet.NET is probably down forever and everything in my mailbox is lost. (I have recovered the missed pups mail via the archive.) Sorry for this screw-up, but it's not my fault, I'm not that machine's admin. (The admin is Stacy Minkin, whom I can't contact because his address is also obviously on that machine.) Sincerely, Michael Sokolov Cellular phone: 216-217-2579 ARPA Internet SMTP mail: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA16866 for pups-liszt; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 14:39:00 +1100 (EST) >From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Thu Jan 7 13:39:39 1999 Received: from henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA16861 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 14:38:52 +1100 (EST) Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA27637 for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 14:39:39 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from wkt) From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Message-Id: <199901070339.OAA27637(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Subject: Re: V8's roots? (fwd) To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (Unix Heritage Society) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 14:39:39 +1100 (EST) Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk ----- Forwarded message from dmr ----- I also got mail from Norman Wilson today about the discussion. This is mainly to confirm and fill out details of Wilson's account. The Eighth Edition system started with (I believe) BSD 4.1c and the work was done on VAX 11/750s -- our group did not get a 780 until a while later. Most of the operating system superstructure of BSD was retained (in particular no one (even the indefatigable Norman) wanted to get much into the paging code. Norman is also right that the competitor was John Reiser's (and Tom London's) 32V descendant from another group at the Labs. In structure this system had a lot to offer (in particular the buffer cache and the page pool were unified, but it was clear that their work was not being supported by their own management. It was used for a while on our first 750 and also our first 11/780 ("alice", a name that lives in netnews fame preceding the reach of Dejanews). The big change leading to V8 was the scooping-out and replacement of the character-device and networking part by the streams mechanism. Later, Peter Weinberger added the file-system switch that enabled remote file systems and prescient things ideas like /proc). Weinberger, as Norman said, also did a simple-minded FFS. The TCP/IP stack wasn't very important to us then and it has a mixed and murky history. Much of it came from early CSRG work, but it was converted to a streams approach by Robert Morris and subsequently fiddled over a lot. Likewise, as Norman said, the applications (/bin and whatnot) were somewhat of a mixture. Many were the locally-done versions, some were taken from BSD in some incarnation, some from System V. Dennis ----- End of forwarded message from dmr -----

26 years, 4 months

Re: V8's roots?

by norman＠nose.cita.utoronto.ca

The operating system kernel on the V8 distribution tape (which was sent to less than a dozen places, under special license) was indeed descended from one of the 4.1 BSD releases; I have a vague memory that it was 4.1a, but I wasn't there at the time, and don't know just what was in each of the intermediate 4.1s. As I understand the history (again, I wasn't there when this part happened), when the Computing Science Research Center decided to move its main computing world to VAX in the early 1980s, they wanted a reasonably stable, reasonably fast system with paging, and 4.1x (for whatever value of x it was) seemed the best available choice. The only real competitor was the paging descendant of 32/V done by John Reiser (who did the original 32/V port to the VAX, I believe), but that system seemed to have lost the evolutionary battle and was judged a bad bet. It may help to identify the kernel in question to know that it probably didn't have sockets yet, and certainly didn't have FFS. The 4.1x kernel was just used as a base, however. By the time I arrived at the Center in late 1984, a good bit had been added and replaced: the V7-heritage terminal IO subsystem had been kicked out in favour of Dennis Ritchie's stream I/O system; Peter Weinberger's simple disk file system speedups (4KB blocks and a bitmapped free list, nothing more) and network file system code and the corresponding file system switch had been added; Tom Killian's process file system had appeared. The commands in /bin and /usr/bin and whatnot had less obvious BSD influence, and I suspect they were mostly carried over from the system used internally on the PDP11s when the VAXes first arrived. Norman Wilson (six years in New Jersey drove me out of the country) Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA15731 for pups-liszt; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 10:29:31 +1100 (EST)

26 years, 4 months

Twist of Fate...

by Erin W. Corliss

So get this -- Matt Kjaer, a friend of a friend of mine and the person who originally got me interested in PDP's, works at the University of Oregon computing center. He claims that if he can dig it up, the University of Oregon has an original Unix license for PDP-11's. I'm not sure what version of Unix it is or if it's even from SCO, but assuming it is, where do we fax/mail/deliver/etc a copy of it to get access to the legendary protected FTP directory with the source codes? Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA15372 for pups-liszt; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 09:19:53 +1100 (EST) >From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Thu Jan 7 08:20:25 1999 Received: from henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA15367 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 09:19:45 +1100 (EST) Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA19617; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 09:20:25 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from wkt) From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Message-Id: <199901062220.JAA19617(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Subject: Re: Twist of Fate... In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990106125635.20195A-100000(a)coffee.corliss.net> from "Erin W. Corliss" at "Jan 6, 1999 1: 6:48 pm" To: erin(a)coffee.corliss.net (Erin W. Corliss) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 09:20:25 +1100 (EST) Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (Unix Heritage Society) Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk In article by Erin W. Corliss: > > So get this -- Matt Kjaer, a friend of a friend of mine and the person who > originally got me interested in PDP's, works at the University of Oregon > computing center. He claims that if he can dig it up, the University of > Oregon has an original Unix license for PDP-11's. I'm not sure what > version of Unix it is or if it's even from SCO, but assuming it is, where > do we fax/mail/deliver/etc a copy of it to get access to the legendary > protected FTP directory with the source codes? Fax a copy to me (the pages giving the license owner, the license number, the list of operating systems covered, the list of CPUs covered, and the signatures), and then get Matt to email me! As per usual, I need to send back access details securely. A fax number or a means of obtaining a PGP key will allow me to do this. Cheers, Warren Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA15403 for pups-liszt; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 09:26:20 +1100 (EST) >From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Thu Jan 7 08:26:54 1999 Received: from henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA15398 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 09:26:12 +1100 (EST) Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA19685; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 09:26:54 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from wkt) From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Message-Id: <199901062226.JAA19685(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Subject: Re: Twist of Fate... In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990106142501.20945A-100000(a)coffee.corliss.net> from "Erin W. Corliss" at "Jan 6, 1999 2:26:32 pm" To: erin(a)coffee.corliss.net (Erin W. Corliss) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 09:26:54 +1100 (EST) Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (Unix Heritage Society) Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk In article by Erin W. Corliss: > On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Warren Toomey wrote: > > > Fax a copy to me (the pages giving the license owner, the license number, > > the list of operating systems covered, the list of CPUs covered, and the > > signatures), and then get Matt to email me! > > What's your fax number? Damn, I knew I'd forget to put that in! Warren: +61 2 6268 8581 Ciao, Warren Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA15593 for pups-liszt; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 10:00:00 +1100 (EST) >From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Thu Jan 7 09:00:40 1999 Received: from henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA15588 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 09:59:53 +1100 (EST) Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA19815 for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 10:00:40 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from wkt) From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Message-Id: <199901062300.KAA19815(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Subject: Bob Manners: new email addr? To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (Unix Heritage Society) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 10:00:40 +1100 (EST) Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk Sorry to bother the list. Mail to Bob Manners rjm(a)swift.eng.ox.ac.uk is bouncing, and I know he'd like to stay on the PUPS list. Has anybody got a new address for him? Thanks, Warren Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA15622 for pups-liszt; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 10:04:51 +1100 (EST)

26 years, 4 months

Re: OK I got this here VAXen thingie.... what is it?

by mxs46＠k2.scl.cwru.edu

"User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> wrote: > Machine: VAXstation 3500, no consoles or external boxes, only the tower. Will run my latest OS release, 4.3BSD-Quasijarus0, like a charm. > Tape Drive: TK70 Great! 4.3BSD-Quasijarus0 bootstraps from TK70s beaufifully. > Hard Drive: RA70 Also great! You are incredibly lucky here that 4.3BSD-* already knows about RA70 and thus you can install 4.3BSD-Quasijarus0 on this disk directly even when it's unlabeled. If you had third-party MSCP disks, you would have to install Ultrix first to label the disk. This is due to 4.3BSD-Quasijarus0's inability to install on unknown unlabeled disks. This limitation will be lifted in the next Quasijarus release, which I'm already working on. > 1 KA650 -BA A very nice CPU, rated at 2.8 VUPs. 4.3BSD-Quasijarus0 fully supports it (better than CSRG's Tahoe and Reno releases). KA650 support is present in the GENERIC kernel, so it will Just Boot (tm). The "-BA" part means that it has bit 1 set in the second longword of the EPROM, causing DEC proprietary OSes to treat it as a "single-user" machine. Research OSes like 4.3BSD-* ignore this bit. But if you do want to convert your machine to "multiuser" status, clear bit 1, set bit 0, and recalculate the checksum (you'll need an EPROM blaster). This will turn your CPU into a KA650-AA. You also have the option of upgrading this CPU to a KA655 (3.8 VUPs) or KA660 (5 VUPs). KA655 is also fully supported by 4.3BSD-Quasijarus0, and KA660 support is coming soon (100% guarrantee that I'll get it before NetBSD does). > 2 MS650 -AA > 3 MS650 -AA -AA is a 8 MB board, so you have a total of 16 MB of RAM. Note, though, that -AAs are old boards, and they work only with KA650 and KA640. If you decide to upgrade to KA655 or KA660, you'll need either DEC MS650-Bx or third-party MS650-compatible memory. These work with all KA650 series CPUs. > 4 DELQA -SA Ethernet. Fully supported by Berkeley UNIX since 4.3BSD. > 5 VCB02 > 6 VCB02 > 7 VCB02 QDSS video. 4.3BSD-Quasijarus0 should support this (untested), but since you don't have a VAXstation monitor or keyboard anyway, pull these three boards out and move everything else to the right (you can't leave empty Q-bus slots in the middle). > 8 CXY08 8-line asynchronous multiplexer (8-port serial interface). Not sure if 4.3BSD-* has a driver for it (I haven't touched this area and left it as it was in CSRG's Tahoe release). It has some drivers for DEC asynchronous multiplexers, but DEC made a lot of different ones, and I don't know where does CXY08 stand with respect to everything else DEC has produced. Ultrix supports it for sure, though. > 9 TQK70 Controller for TK70. > 10 KDA50 > 11 KDA50 Controller for RA70 (or any other SDI disks you may want to connect). > Any suggestions are appreciated. Hmm, it looks like you have already been brainwashed by one NutBSDist. Please don't listen to him. Running NetBSD is conduct unbecoming a PUPS/TUHS member. NetBSD is the worst OS a VAX can run. Its code is a total mess, and its "developers" are incompetent morons (I know, I've been on their list for 6 months or so). They have no clue as to how to write VAX OSes, and their list of supported hardware is as skinny as their brains. NetBSD is extremely flaky, and it's extremely bloated. My authoritative advice to you is to run 4.3BSD-Quasijarus0, my latest release made two weeks ago (I'm the maintainer of 4.3BSD-*). It comes with 100% complete source code, and, picture this, the entire system with all binaries _and full sources_ fits in 75 MB! It's absolutely True and Pure UNIX, nothing can be better. There is also Ultrix. No matter how much those losers insult it, it's one of the best OSes in the Universe, second only to 4.3BSD-Quasijarus. Despite what some incompetent morons may say, it is not a "4.2/4.3 mix", it's 100% 4.3. True, it has been interDIGITated by DEC, which makes it a little impure and bloated (and binary-only), but otherwise it's OK. It is bigger than a binary-only 4.3BSD-Quasijarus0 installation, but certainly much smaller than NutBSD. As for the DEC additions, just ignore them! Just because Ultrix optionally supports Sun YP, Hesiod, and other crap doesn't mean that you have to use it! In fact, it's already disabled by default! Just don't enable it, that's all! When /etc/svc.conf selects "local,bind" for hosts and "local" for everything else, Ultrix becomes indistinguishable from 4.3BSD! I can bet that if I show you two VAXen, one running 4.3BSD and the other running Ultrix, you won't be able to tell easily which is which. Also some Ultrix-specific features are really nice. Take NFS, for example. I will certainly add NFS to 4.3BSD-Quasijarus at some point. Also don't forget that Ultrix runs on almost every VAX ever made. I often run Ultrix instead of 4.3BSD-* when the latter doesn't run on the hardware in question. In fact, this is what Ultrix is best for: a fallback OS to replace 4.3BSD-* when it doesn't support the hardware. Of course 4.3BSD-Quasijarus is the best OS in the Universe, and you should always run it whenever possible, but when you can't Ultrix is a very good fallback because it's so close. But since you have a KA650, you don't have to worry about this, as 4.3BSD-Quasijarus0 will run on it like a charm. Best of luck with it. 4.3BSD-Quasijarus0 is in the PUPS archive in the Distributions/4bsd/43quasi0.vax directory. Sincerely, Michael Sokolov Cellular phone: 216-217-2579 ARPA Internet SMTP mail: mxs46(a)k2.scl.cwru.edu Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id GAA14819 for pups-liszt; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 06:35:05 +1100 (EST)

26 years, 4 months

Re: OK I got this here VAXen thingie.... what is it?

by Johnny Billquist

On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys wrote: > OK, Dummy here stuck his foot in his choppers an' won the bid on that > VAXen for the grand total of eleven buckeroos de realme. What can I > run with it? It was just too much fun to pass up, and it drew too many > chuckles from the PC crowd in the surplus warehouse....(:+}}.... Smile. It's a decent machine. > Machine: VAXstation 3500, no consoles or external boxes, only the tower. > > Tape Drive: TK70 > > Hard Drive: RA70 > > Boards: > > SLOT BOARD NUMBER DESCRIPTION > ---- ------------ ---------------------------------------------- > 1 KA650 -BA CPU > 2 MS650 -AA > 3 MS650 -AA Both are memory boards. Don't know for sure how much. 8 or 16 megs apiece, I'd guess. > 4 DELQA -SA Ethernet. > 5 VCB02 > 6 VCB02 > 7 VCB02 Sounds like a graphic subsystem. > 8 CXY08 Plotter interface? > 9 TQK70 Controller for the TK70 tape drive. > 10 KDA50 > 11 KDA50 Controller for the RA70 disk. (The controller can have up to four disks attached). > What boards are needed to bring up the machine minimally and test it out? CPU and memory minimum. I'd recommend to remove the VCB02 and CXY08, since you don't have the peripherials. Move all other cards up to delete the empty space in the middle. > How should one fire it up the first time, without blowing it up? Turn on the power. > I am working with the original owner of the beast to see if he may have > a box of odd manuals and hopefully tapes still in storage somewhere. > If not, I am at ground zero with it. It's a pretty easy machine to play around with. > I am assuming it will have to be run headless, via an old VT-52ish > Zenith terminal I have, or a Kermit with VT-100 emulation. I don't > have the main color monitor for it, or the mouse and keyboard. > What is the pinout of the silly MMJ connector on the CPU? > Will a plain terminal work OK? Plain terminal will do. In fact, it *expexts* to get a plain terminal. The MMJ is a DEC thingie. The electrical levels are compatible with RS-232. You can get a cable from DEC, or perhaps some other place. I also know that the pinouts have been published on the net from tim to time. > What kinds of printer can be hooked up to it, via what protocols? Protocols? That's software! As for electrically connecting it, that depends on what card you put in the machine! Paralell or serial, you choose! > What is the best way to network it into my local home ethernet coax? I assume you have 10Base2, so get an AUI-cable to extend the connection from the DELQA to outside the box, get a 10Base2-transciever, and you're set. For other types of carriers, get the proper transciever! :-) > Any suggestions are appreciated. Yes. Boot NetBSD on it. Get 1.3.2, which works pretty fine on the machine. You can netboot it to get started. Johnny Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt(a)update.uu.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id IAA11143 for pups-liszt; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 08:54:54 +1100 (EST) >From "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Wed Jan 6 07:47:55 1999 Received: from seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.88.4]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA11138 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 08:54:44 +1100 (EST) Received: (from rdkeys@localhost) by seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA28061; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:47:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rdkeys) From: "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Message-Id: <199901052147.QAA28061(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Subject: Re: OK I got this here VAXen thingie.... what is it? In-Reply-To: <Pine.VUL.3.93.990105205913.2044A-100000(a)Zeke.Update.UU.SE> from Johnny Billquist at "Jan 5, 99 09:07:11 pm" To: bqt(a)Update.UU.SE (Johnny Billquist) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:47:55 -0500 (EST) Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au, bsdbob(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk > On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys wrote: > > > OK, Dummy here stuck his foot in his choppers an' won the bid on that > > VAXen for the grand total of eleven buckeroos de realme. What can I > > run with it? It was just too much fun to pass up, and it drew too many > > chuckles from the PC crowd in the surplus warehouse....(:+}}.... > > Smile. It's a decent machine. I am beginning to think my eleven buckeroos de realme were well spent! > > Hard Drive: RA70 What different SDI(?) drives will fit and work in the VAXstation, for our play purposes. Someone mentioned a 1 gig and a 2 gig size that I might want to use instead of the RA70, although beggars like me can't be too choosy. A pair of RA70's would make a fair minimal box. A pair of 2 gig drives would make a very comfy box to use as the main home server. > > What boards are needed to bring up the machine minimally and test it out? > > CPU and memory minimum. > I'd recommend to remove the VCB02 and CXY08, since you don't have the > peripherials. Move all other cards up to delete the empty space in the > middle. OK. What should cover the blank space in the rack, or just leave it open? Any funky jumpers to set like on Sun VME backplanes? > > How should one fire it up the first time, without blowing it up? > > Turn on the power. I was thinking about boot sequences for roms or whatever, or anything strange in the callup from a dumb terminal. Someone mentioned setting a break switch and a baud rate dial on the CPU? > > I am working with the original owner of the beast to see if he may have > > a box of odd manuals and hopefully tapes still in storage somewhere. > > If not, I am at ground zero with it. > > It's a pretty easy machine to play around with. I did get a box from the previous owner a few minutes ago, and there were a dozen or so TK50 tapes that I need to sort out what is on them. He though they were Ultrix and VMS tapes. If they turn out to be unknowns, I can probably use them to get someone to write a good boot tape for a BSD flavor, perhaps. If they are, indeed Ultrix, would that be better or worse than a 4.3BSD or NetBSD or such? I have never run Ultrix, but I am comfy with 4.3BSD or NetBSD kinds of things, as long as they don't get too strange. I don't think I would like a VMS. > Plain terminal will do. In fact, it *expexts* to get a plain terminal. > The MMJ is a DEC thingie. The electrical levels are compatible with > RS-232. You can get a cable from DEC, or perhaps some other place. I also > know that the pinouts have been published on the net from tim to time. Also, the guy gave me a cable with a DEC female DB25 adapter, a MMJ end, an RJ11 end, and a plain RS232 DB25 male adapter. Would that be usable for a console or is that some kind of printer cable? He thought it was plain serial, but was not sure. > > What kinds of printer can be hooked up to it, via what protocols? > > Protocols? That's software! > As for electrically connecting it, that depends on what card you put in > the machine! Paralell or serial, you choose! Well, I prefer serial, no-handshake printer lines on my old junkque. That is a carryover from my early CP/M days where one never knew which RS232 cable to use, and I got quickly in the habit of 3-wiring everything, instead. Software or non-shake protocol always worked, if 4/5, 4/8/20 were jumpered on each end. One of my friends said that DEC did some strange protocols on serial lines, and I was just checking for sure. > > What is the best way to network it into my local home ethernet coax? > > I assume you have 10Base2, so get an AUI-cable to extend the connection > from the DELQA to outside the box, get a 10Base2-transciever, and you're > set. For other types of carriers, get the proper transciever! :-) I must rub the right rabbit's food today. Another friend gave me a DEC dongle box and cable that is an AUI to BNC transceiver (DECSTA?). That is a good find, or the right find, perhaps? > > Any suggestions are appreciated. > > Yes. Boot NetBSD on it. Get 1.3.2, which works pretty fine on the machine. > You can netboot it to get started. My problem is getting it up to a network. My home net is mostly down or only running between whichever two boxes I can get up at the same time. Most are AIX/4.3BSD IBM RT-PC boxes or FreeBSD/AIX x86 boxes. Proper netbooting on them is a bit wierd. I might could drag it into the office and netboot off the archives somewhere. That may be the easiest thing to do, practically. Most of the boxes I prefer to load via tape, if possible for a lowest common denominator boot when all else may fail. That way, everything is covered. What needs to be cleaned out around the cabinetry or power supplies or backplane? I don't want to get dustbunny fireballs rolling out of it, if possible. Is there anything I should look out for in preflighting the beast, over the usual blow it out with a vacuum cleaner or air hose? > Johnny Anyway, toy VAXuser getting there little by little.....(:+}}.... Maybe I will get the itch to fire it up tonight. Now to feed the Reddy Kilowatt meter man. I hear these VAXen things make him very happy. Bob Keys Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA11273 for pups-liszt; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 09:33:18 +1100 (EST) >From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Wed Jan 6 08:33:57 1999 Received: from henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA11268 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 09:33:09 +1100 (EST) Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA12801 for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 09:33:57 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from wkt) From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Message-Id: <199901052233.JAA12801(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Subject: V8's roots? To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (Unix Heritage Society) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 09:33:57 +1100 (EST) Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk Just got this email from a friend... ----- Forwarded message from David Blackman ----- Just had a quick look at [Warren's Unix family tree diagram] You list Research V8 as successor to V7, which is true i guess, but i've seen several sources say most of the kernel was derived from a BSD version, probably 4.1. ----- End of forwarded message from David Blackman ----- Can anybody confirm or deny this? I suppose I should ask Dennis. Ta, Warren Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA11605 for pups-liszt; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 11:36:31 +1100 (EST) >From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Wed Jan 6 10:37:10 1999 Received: from henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA11600 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 11:36:23 +1100 (EST) Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA15385 for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 11:37:10 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from wkt) From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Message-Id: <199901060037.LAA15385(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Subject: Apout: new version + freeze To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (Unix Heritage Society) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 11:37:10 +1100 (EST) Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk All, I've put yet a new version of the Apout PDP-11 a.out simulator in ftp://minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/pub/PDP-11/Sims/Apout and now I'm going to stop working on it for a while. This means you won't get these annoying emails any more :-) Current version is apout2.2alpha6. The latest changes are: + Runs 2.11BSD binaries, including overlay binaries + Runs shell scripts + Can exec native binaries as well as PDP-11 a.out binaries + Has floating point operations + Still emulates V5/V6/V7 UNIX binaries + On a Pentium Pro 350MHz, compiles the 2.11BSD GENERIC kernel in 4 minutes 16 seconds. + Now uses u_int* throughout + Finally, a man page exists Enjoy! Warren Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA12041 for pups-liszt; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 13:56:09 +1100 (EST) >From Johnny Billquist <bqt(a)Update.UU.SE> Wed Jan 6 12:54:31 1999 Received: from Zeke.Update.UU.SE (IDENT:2026@Zeke.Update.UU.SE [130.238.11.14]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA12035 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 13:55:56 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (bqt@localhost) by Zeke.Update.UU.SE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA12954; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 03:54:33 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 03:54:31 +0100 (MET) From: Johnny Billquist <bqt(a)Update.UU.SE> To: "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au, bsdbob(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu Subject: Re: OK I got this here VAXen thingie.... what is it? In-Reply-To: <199901052147.QAA28061(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Message-ID: <Pine.VUL.3.93.990106033734.12114A-100000(a)Zeke.Update.UU.SE> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys wrote: > I am beginning to think my eleven buckeroos de realme were well spent! I'd say so. > What different SDI(?) drives will fit and work in the VAXstation, for our > play purposes. Someone mentioned a 1 gig and a 2 gig size that I might > want to use instead of the RA70, although beggars like me can't be too > choosy. A pair of RA70's would make a fair minimal box. A pair of > 2 gig drives would make a very comfy box to use as the main home server. Fit as in physically fit. The RA7x series will fit. However, only the RA70 as far as I know have a switch pack for setting unit numbers. Any other type of drive will default to unit zero unless you have a proper front panel. All RA-drives will work however. Me I have one RA72 in the box, two RA90 and one RA92 lying on the floor. :-) Also remember that VAX binaries are *smaller* than what you might be used to see. This is a CISC. > OK. What should cover the blank space in the rack, or just leave it open? If you have blank covers, put them there. It improves the air flow in the box. But you should be able to run it as is. > Any funky jumpers to set like on Sun VME backplanes? Nope. Just keep al the cards next to each other. > > > How should one fire it up the first time, without blowing it up? > > > > Turn on the power. > > I was thinking about boot sequences for roms or whatever, or anything > strange in the callup from a dumb terminal. Someone mentioned setting > a break switch and a baud rate dial on the CPU? Ok. To boot the machine, try "B <device>", where disks are DUAx, tape is MUA0 and ethernet XNA0 (I think...) If you open up the front you'll notice that the CPU fron panel cover has, in addition to the connector for the console, a small display, a three position dial switch and a two-position switch. If you look at the back of the panel, you have thumbweel. The thumbweel sets the baudrate for the console. There should be a sticker beside it with the key. The three-position switch selects power-up action. Language menu, boot or eternal selftest. The two-position switch selects whether booting to console prompt, or booting all the way with OS. There are a number of commands you can give at the ">>>" prompt. Useful is (among others) "SHOW ETHERNET" which tells your ethernet address. > I did get a box from the previous owner a few minutes ago, and there > were a dozen or so TK50 tapes that I need to sort out what is on them. Try booting them. > He though they were Ultrix and VMS tapes. If they turn out to be > unknowns, I can probably use them to get someone to write a good > boot tape for a BSD flavor, perhaps. If they are, indeed Ultrix, > would that be better or worse than a 4.3BSD or NetBSD or such? Ultrix is definitely not something you want to run. It's okay to have around, but it's not that much fun. It's more or less a mix between 4.2 and 4.3. > I have never run Ultrix, but I am comfy with 4.3BSD or NetBSD kinds > of things, as long as they don't get too strange. I don't think I > would like a VMS. VMS is nice. :-) > > Plain terminal will do. In fact, it *expexts* to get a plain terminal. > > The MMJ is a DEC thingie. The electrical levels are compatible with > > RS-232. You can get a cable from DEC, or perhaps some other place. I also > > know that the pinouts have been published on the net from tim to time. > > Also, the guy gave me a cable with a DEC female DB25 adapter, a MMJ end, > an RJ11 end, and a plain RS232 DB25 male adapter. Would that be usable > for a console or is that some kind of printer cable? He thought it was > plain serial, but was not sure. The cable should be usable. If you have a VT220 or newer, the cable can be used without any adapter at all. > > > What kinds of printer can be hooked up to it, via what protocols? > > > > Protocols? That's software! > > As for electrically connecting it, that depends on what card you put in > > the machine! Paralell or serial, you choose! > > Well, I prefer serial, no-handshake printer lines on my old junkque. Ah. Intelligent opinion. Since the CXY08 is a serial interface, that's your answer. (If the CXY08 has a driver for the OS of your choise.) > That is a carryover from my early CP/M days where one never knew > which RS232 cable to use, and I got quickly in the habit of 3-wiring > everything, instead. Software or non-shake protocol always worked, > if 4/5, 4/8/20 were jumpered on each end. One of my friends said that > DEC did some strange protocols on serial lines, and I was just checking > for sure. DEC has very seldom done strange things. It's rather the other way around... Most likely your friend might have heard of DECs refusal to use modem signals for handshake, since neither a computer, nor a printer is a modem. (And by the book they are right, it's just that most other people like to violate this fact. :-) DEC always uses XON/XOFF. > > > What is the best way to network it into my local home ethernet coax? > > > > I assume you have 10Base2, so get an AUI-cable to extend the connection > > from the DELQA to outside the box, get a 10Base2-transciever, and you're > > set. For other types of carriers, get the proper transciever! :-) > > I must rub the right rabbit's food today. Another friend gave me a DEC dongle > box and cable that is an AUI to BNC transceiver (DECSTA?). That is a good > find, or the right find, perhaps? Probably. I don't know offhand what the DEC transciever is called, but I doubt there are any others with the right kind of looking connectors. > > > Any suggestions are appreciated. > > > > Yes. Boot NetBSD on it. Get 1.3.2, which works pretty fine on the machine. > > You can netboot it to get started. > > My problem is getting it up to a network. My home net is mostly down > or only running between whichever two boxes I can get up at the same time. > Most are AIX/4.3BSD IBM RT-PC boxes or FreeBSD/AIX x86 boxes. Proper > netbooting on them is a bit wierd. Well, it isn't *them* you are about to netboot, but the VAX. :-) > I might could drag it into the office and netboot off the archives somewhere. > That may be the easiest thing to do, practically. Maybe. > Most of the boxes I prefer to load via tape, if possible for a lowest common > denominator boot when all else may fail. That way, everything is covered. Well, if you have VMS or Ultrix, you can write out tapes... > What needs to be cleaned out around the cabinetry or power supplies or > backplane? I don't want to get dustbunny fireballs rolling out of it, > if possible. Is there anything I should look out for in preflighting > the beast, over the usual blow it out with a vacuum cleaner or air hose? Getting the dust out is always a Good Thing (tm). If you are a hardware junkie, you'll start by disassembling the power supply into small bits and check it out througly before reassembling it and allowing it to feed the system. Me, I'd just power the thing on. :-) > Anyway, toy VAXuser getting there little by little.....(:+}}.... > Maybe I will get the itch to fire it up tonight. Now to feed the > Reddy Kilowatt meter man. I hear these VAXen things make him very > happy. Nah. A 3500 is a small thing. Try an 8650 instead. :-) Johnny Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt(a)update.uu.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA12768 for pups-liszt; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 17:37:38 +1100 (EST) >From Kirk McKusick <mckusick(a)mckusick.com> Wed Jan 6 15:46:58 1999 Received: from flamingo.McKusick.COM (flamingo.mckusick.com [209.31.233.178]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA12763 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 17:37:15 +1100 (EST) Received: from flamingo.McKusick.COM (mckusick@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by flamingo.McKusick.COM (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA26800; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 21:47:34 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199901060547.VAA26800(a)flamingo.McKusick.COM> To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au Subject: Re: V8's roots? cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (Unix Heritage Society) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 Jan 1999 09:33:57 +1100." <199901052233.JAA12801(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 21:46:58 -0800 From: Kirk McKusick <mckusick(a)mckusick.com> Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Subject: V8's roots? To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (Unix Heritage Society) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 09:33:57 +1100 (EST) Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Just got this email from a friend... ----- Forwarded message from David Blackman ----- Just had a quick look at [Warren's Unix family tree diagram] You list Research V8 as successor to V7, which is true i guess, but i've seen several sources say most of the kernel was derived from a BSD version, probably 4.1. ----- End of forwarded message from David Blackman ----- Can anybody confirm or deny this? I suppose I should ask Dennis. Ta, Warren There was a big infusion of 4.1BSD into the research group system between V7 and V8. Dennis could give you more details. ~Kirk Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id FAA14605 for pups-liszt; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 05:14:10 +1100 (EST) >From Carl Lowenstein <cdl(a)mpl.ucsd.edu> Thu Jan 7 04:07:15 1999 Received: from mpl.ucsd.edu (chiton.ucsd.edu [192.135.238.128]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA14600 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 05:14:01 +1100 (EST) Received: (from cdl@localhost) by mpl.ucsd.edu (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id KAA24704; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 10:07:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 10:07:15 -0800 (PST) From: Carl Lowenstein <cdl(a)mpl.ucsd.edu> Message-Id: <199901061807.KAA24704(a)mpl.ucsd.edu> To: bqt(a)Update.UU.SE, rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu Subject: Re: OK I got this here VAXen thingie.... what is it? Cc: bsdbob(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu, pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk > Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 21:07:11 +0100 (MET) > From: Johnny Billquist <bqt(a)Update.UU.SE> > On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys wrote: > > > OK, Dummy here stuck his foot in his choppers an' won the bid on that > > VAXen for the grand total of eleven buckeroos de realme. What can I > > run with it? It was just too much fun to pass up, and it drew too many > > chuckles from the PC crowd in the surplus warehouse....(:+}}.... > > I assume you have 10Base2, so get an AUI-cable to extend the connection > from the DELQA to outside the box, get a 10Base2-transciever, and you're > set. For other types of carriers, get the proper transciever! :-) For short runs of AUI cable (a couple of feet) you can cheat by using crimp-on IDC connectors and flat ribbon cable. Frequently that is more available than real AUI cables. carl carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego clowenstein(a)ucsd.edu Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id GAA14757 for pups-liszt; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 06:27:50 +1100 (EST)

26 years, 4 months

Why is csh `restricted'?

by Warren Toomey

I've got a questions that's been niggling me, and perhaps someone might be able to answer it. The csh was first released in 2bsd, and came with the copyright notice: /* Copyright (c) 1979 Regents of the University of California */ /* * C Shell * * Bill Joy, UC Berkeley * October, 1978 */ But my memory tells me that, back in the late 80s, people were saying that the sources to csh were not freely available. And in the tcsh FAQ (taken from tcsh version 6.00), I see: 4. Where can I get csh sources? Csh sources are not public domain. If you do not have an AT&T V3.2 source licence or better, you are stuck. So, can anybody tell me if, when and how did the sources to csh become restricted, or if not, how this urban legend arose?? Many thanks in advance! Warren Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA08168 for pups-liszt; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:26:55 +1100 (EST) >From "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Tue Jan 5 15:26:35 1999 Received: from moe.2bsd.com (0(a)MOE.2BSD.COM [206.139.202.200]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA08163 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:26:46 +1100 (EST) Received: (from sms@localhost) by moe.2bsd.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id VAA19409; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 21:26:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 21:26:35 -0800 (PST) From: "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Message-Id: <199901050526.VAA19409(a)moe.2bsd.com> To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au Subject: Re: Why is csh `restricted'? Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk Warren - > The csh was first released in 2bsd, and came with the copyright notice: > /* Copyright (c) 1979 Regents of the University of California */ > /* > * C Shell > * > * Bill Joy, UC Berkeley > * October, 1978 > */ > Csh sources are not public domain. If you do not have an AT&T V3.2 > source licence or better, you are stuck. > > So, can anybody tell me if, when and how did the sources to csh become > restricted, or if not, how this urban legend arose?? It is not that they "became" restricted. They always "were" restricted because they were derived from the original Bell Labs (later AT&T) sources (code borrowed from /bin/sh). All UNIX sources were, up until you negotiated the deal with SCO, restricted. For a long time you either had a multi-kilodollar source license or you didn't run UNIX at all. The binary distributions came a bit later. Initially when 'csh' was being written you had to have a source license. Typically you'd pay (if memory serves) $25k or so (quite a chunk of cash in 1979) for a WesternElectric license, park the tapes in a rack and send a copy of the license and a check for a few hundred dollars off to UCB to get the software you really intended to run ;) You'll note that the copyright lacks the "may be redistributed ..." clauses that we typically associate with UCB software. The famous UCB style of copyright ("copyrighted but redistributable") came later. Steven Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA08185 for pups-liszt; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:29:51 +1100 (EST) >From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Tue Jan 5 15:30:25 1999 Received: from henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA08180 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:29:44 +1100 (EST) Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA11231; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:30:25 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from wkt) From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Message-Id: <199901050530.QAA11231(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Subject: Re: Why is csh `restricted'? In-Reply-To: <199901050526.VAA19409(a)moe.2bsd.com> from "Steven M. Schultz" at "Jan 4, 1999 9:26:35 pm" To: sms(a)moe.2bsd.com (Steven M. Schultz) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:30:25 +1100 (EST) Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (Unix Heritage Society) Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk In article by Steven M. Schultz: > Warren - > > > The csh was first released in 2bsd, and came with the copyright notice: > > /* Copyright (c) 1979 Regents of the University of California */ > > So, can anybody tell me if, when and how did the sources to csh become > > restricted, or if not, how this urban legend arose?? > > It is not that they "became" restricted. They always "were" restricted > because they were derived from the original Bell Labs (later AT&T) > sources (code borrowed from /bin/sh). All UNIX sources were, up until > you negotiated the deal with SCO, restricted. > > Steven I didn't know that any of the sources in 1979 2bsd were contaminated with AT&T sources. I'll go and do a line comparison between V6 sh, V7 sh and the 2bsd csh, and see if I can find any signs of contamination. What else in the original 2bsd is contaminated? Thanks! Warren Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA08404 for pups-liszt; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:49:27 +1100 (EST) >From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Tue Jan 5 15:50:06 1999 Received: from henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA08398 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:49:18 +1100 (EST) Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA11350 for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:50:06 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from wkt) From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Message-Id: <199901050550.QAA11350(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Subject: Re: Why is csh `restricted'? In-Reply-To: <199901050530.QAA11231(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> from Warren Toomey at "Jan 5, 1999 4:30:25 pm" To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (Unix Heritage Society) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:50:06 +1100 (EST) Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk In article by Warren Toomey: > In article by Steven M. Schultz: > > > So, can anybody tell me if, when and how did the sources to csh become > > > restricted, or if not, how this urban legend arose?? > > > > It is not that they "became" restricted. They always "were" restricted > > because they were derived from the original Bell Labs (later AT&T) > > sources (code borrowed from /bin/sh). All UNIX sources were, up until > > you negotiated the deal with SCO, restricted. > > > > Steven Steven is right. An investigation into the csh from 2bsd shows that it is derived from the Mashey shell in 6th Edition UNIX, but not from the Bourne shell in 7th Edition. Hmm, I'll have to go and update my UNIX family tree now. Warren Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA08434 for pups-liszt; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:58:07 +1100 (EST) >From "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Tue Jan 5 15:57:01 1999 Received: from moe.2bsd.com (0(a)MOE.2BSD.COM [206.139.202.200]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA08429 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:57:58 +1100 (EST) Received: (from sms@localhost) by moe.2bsd.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id VAA19580; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 21:57:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 21:57:01 -0800 (PST) From: "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Message-Id: <199901050557.VAA19580(a)moe.2bsd.com> To: sms(a)moe.2bsd.com, wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au Subject: Re: Why is csh `restricted'? Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk Warren - > From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> > I didn't know that any of the sources in 1979 2bsd were contaminated with > AT&T sources. I'll go and do a line comparison between V6 sh, V7 sh and Indeed they were. ALL sources were considered "contaminated" or restricted - that's why for years and years the only 2.x (and 4.x) BSD sites were universities or other companies that had source licenses. > the 2bsd csh, and see if I can find any signs of contamination. > > What else in the original 2bsd is contaminated? Anything that I (or other contributors) didn't write ourselves. A good case can be made that stuff ported from 4.4-Lite is not contaminated (because 4.4-Lite had the legal blessings of AT&T) but I was told at one time anything based on the Net-2 stuff could be (is?) contaminated. Alas by the time 4.4-Lite came out the software had bloated so much that very little of it can be ported over. I grabbed a few ideas and pieces out of the kernel - that's where the "sysctl" stuff in 2.11 came from for example. But the mainline applications are GNU based (megabytes and megabytes of memory assumed). I'd like to see someone getting GCC to run natively on a PDP-11! <grin> That's why the SCO "Ancient Unix" license is such a milestone event and is so important (perhaps more so than some folks realize). Up until this point you had to have a US$100K budget to gain access to the software we can legally obtain for $100 (no 'K') now. Steven Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA08456 for pups-liszt; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:01:18 +1100 (EST) >From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Tue Jan 5 16:01:49 1999 Received: from henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA08451 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:01:11 +1100 (EST) Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA11467; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:01:49 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from wkt) From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Message-Id: <199901050601.RAA11467(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Subject: Contaminated srcs In-Reply-To: <199901050557.VAA19580(a)moe.2bsd.com> from "Steven M. Schultz" at "Jan 4, 1999 9:57: 1 pm" To: sms(a)moe.2bsd.com (Steven M. Schultz) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:01:49 +1100 (EST) Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (Unix Heritage Society) Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk In article by Steven M. Schultz: > A good case can be made that stuff ported from 4.4-Lite is not > contaminated (because 4.4-Lite had the legal blessings of AT&T) > but I was told at one time anything based on the Net-2 stuff could be > (is?) contaminated. Alas by the time 4.4-Lite came out the software > had bloated so much that very little of it can be ported over. I > grabbed a few ideas and pieces out of the kernel - that's where the > "sysctl" stuff in 2.11 came from for example. But the mainline > applications are GNU based (megabytes and megabytes of memory assumed). > I'd like to see someone getting GCC to run natively on a PDP-11! <grin> > > Steven Just a thought: much of the stuff in 16-bit Minix was written by people on Usenet and donated to Minix. The core stuff of course is owned by Prentice-Hall, but there are some freely-available programs. Warren Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA08490 for pups-liszt; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:10:15 +1100 (EST) >From "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Tue Jan 5 16:09:48 1999 Received: from moe.2bsd.com (0(a)MOE.2BSD.COM [206.139.202.200]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA08485 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:10:07 +1100 (EST) Received: (from sms@localhost) by moe.2bsd.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id WAA19671; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 22:09:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 22:09:48 -0800 (PST) From: "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Message-Id: <199901050609.WAA19671(a)moe.2bsd.com> To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au, wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au Subject: Re: Why is csh `restricted'? Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk Warren - Quite a busy night, eh? > > > sources (code borrowed from /bin/sh). All UNIX sources were, up until > > > you negotiated the deal with SCO, restricted. It might also be a good time to clarify that the sources are still 'restricted'. Legally we can share the sources only with other license holders. However the cost of obtaining the license is vastly more affordable now than in a previous era. > Steven is right. An investigation into the csh from 2bsd shows that it > is derived from the Mashey shell in 6th Edition UNIX, but not from the > Bourne shell in 7th Edition. Hmmm, didn't the V7 shell borrow from the V6 shell? Perhaps not completely "based on" (as in starting from a copy and editing away). Steven Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA08513 for pups-liszt; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:13:07 +1100 (EST) >From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Tue Jan 5 16:13:39 1999 Received: from henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA08502 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:12:58 +1100 (EST) Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA11557; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:13:39 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from wkt) From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Message-Id: <199901050613.RAA11557(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> Subject: Re: Why is csh `restricted'? In-Reply-To: <199901050609.WAA19671(a)moe.2bsd.com> from "Steven M. Schultz" at "Jan 4, 1999 10: 9:48 pm" To: sms(a)moe.2bsd.com (Steven M. Schultz) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:13:39 +1100 (EST) Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au, wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk In article by Steven M. Schultz: > Hmmm, didn't the V7 shell borrow from the V6 shell? Perhaps not > completely "based on" (as in starting from a copy and editing away). > Steven No, from what I heard Bourne nearly started from scratch. I did have a copy of some old Usenet news from John Mashey about the v6 shell; I'll try to dig it up. Warren Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA08520 for pups-liszt; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:13:17 +1100 (EST) >From Greg Lehey <grog(a)lemis.com> Tue Jan 5 16:12:41 1999 Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA08508 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:13:01 +1100 (EST) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by allegro.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA06234; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:42:35 +1030 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) id QAA79334; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:42:42 +1030 (CST) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:42:41 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog(a)lemis.com> To: "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Cc: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au, pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au Subject: Re: Why is csh `restricted'? Message-ID: <19990105164241.E78349(a)freebie.lemis.com> References: <199901050557.VAA19580(a)moe.2bsd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <199901050557.VAA19580(a)moe.2bsd.com>; from Steven M. Schultz on Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 09:57:01PM -0800 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk On Monday, 4 January 1999 at 21:57:01 -0800, Steven M. Schultz wrote: >> From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.edu.au> >> What else in the original 2bsd is contaminated? > > Anything that I (or other contributors) didn't write ourselves. > > A good case can be made that stuff ported from 4.4-Lite is not > contaminated (because 4.4-Lite had the legal blessings of AT&T) > but I was told at one time anything based on the Net-2 stuff could be > (is?) contaminated. There has been a lot of confusion on this point. Well, maybe ``disagreement'' would be a better word. Obviously Net-2 contained almost only stuff written by contributors, though there was, indeed, some code which had obviously grown out of Seventh Edition code. I think somebody mentioned something like 13 files in the context of the lawsuit. I took a look at one (kern_clock.c?), and confirmed that yes, it looked as if it was derived rather than written from scratch. On the other hand, there was nothing which AT&T (or the opponent of the week) could claim to be trade secrets. And IMO none of this could have been construed to mean that people couldn't use the sources which were indisputably completely written by UCB and its contributors. Greg -- See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog(a)lemis.com for PGP public key Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA08605 for pups-liszt; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:54:25 +1100 (EST) >From "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Tue Jan 5 16:45:35 1999 Received: from moe.2bsd.com (0(a)MOE.2BSD.COM [206.139.202.200]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA08599 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:54:16 +1100 (EST) Received: (from sms@localhost) by moe.2bsd.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id WAA19977 for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 22:45:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 22:45:35 -0800 (PST) From: "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Message-Id: <199901050645.WAA19977(a)moe.2bsd.com> To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au Subject: Re: Why is csh `restricted'? Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk Greg - > From: Greg Lehey <grog(a)lemis.com> > > There has been a lot of confusion on this point. Well, maybe > ``disagreement'' would be a better word. Obviously Net-2 contained Hmmm, I think `confusion' is a better fit. Of course said confusion does lead to disagreement eventually ;) > think somebody mentioned something like 13 files in the context of the I'd heard it was 7 files at one time, then 11. It's a fairly small number _but_ the exact list was never disclosed (part of the settlement I understand). Without a list of files the fear (at the time) was that "the enemy" could come after you claiming derivation of some work from the forbidden files. Since you didn't know what files those were it was hard (impossible) to know what you could or couldn't use. > the week) could claim to be trade secrets. And IMO none of this could > have been construed to mean that people couldn't use the sources which > were indisputably completely written by UCB and its contributors. I'm not a lawyer (and don't even play one on the Net;))... That's how you and I (nonlawyer types) think. The sentiment at the time was that up until 4.4-Lite was declared "uncontaminated" there was a danger of being legally targeted for using Net-1 and Net-2. The point is moot now today because all manner of alternatives (FreeBSD for example) exist. That ready availability may have been a big factor in SCO's allowing inexpensive access to the "original" sources (albeit under 'license' rather than "freely available"). Steven Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA08664 for pups-liszt; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 18:17:15 +1100 (EST) >From Greg Lehey <grog(a)lemis.com> Tue Jan 5 17:16:39 1999 Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA08659 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 18:17:05 +1100 (EST) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by allegro.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id RAA06480; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:46:39 +1030 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) id RAA79676; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:46:40 +1030 (CST) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:46:39 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog(a)lemis.com> To: "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au Subject: Re: Why is csh `restricted'? Message-ID: <19990105174639.G78349(a)freebie.lemis.com> References: <199901050645.WAA19977(a)moe.2bsd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <199901050645.WAA19977(a)moe.2bsd.com>; from Steven M. Schultz on Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 10:45:35PM -0800 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk On Monday, 4 January 1999 at 22:45:35 -0800, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > Greg - > >> From: Greg Lehey <grog(a)lemis.com> >> >> There has been a lot of confusion on this point. Well, maybe >> ``disagreement'' would be a better word. Obviously Net-2 contained > > Hmmm, I think `confusion' is a better fit. Of course said confusion > does lead to disagreement eventually ;) We can agree (or is that defuse?) about that. >> think somebody mentioned something like 13 files in the context of the > > I'd heard it was 7 files at one time, then 11. It's a fairly > small number _but_ the exact list was never disclosed (part of the > settlement I understand). Without a list of files the fear (at the > time) was that "the enemy" could come after you claiming derivation > of some work from the forbidden files. Since you didn't know what > files those were it was hard (impossible) to know what you could or > couldn't use. Well, here's an extract from BSDI's announcement dated 8 Feb 1994: > This broadcast message addresses many of the questions that have arrived > in my mailbox in the last few days. > > Q: After this lawsuit resolution, is BSDI still in business? > A: You bet. And we're shipping 1.1 early next week. > > Q: The press release was unclear, do I get to keep my current copy > of BSD/386? > A: The answer is yes! BSDI is not recalling prior versions. > Any USA domestic customer whose support was valid through December, > 1993 will be shipped the new V1.1 release. I will be mailing a paper > letter to each USA domestic customer detailing their service contract > status and verifying the V1.1 shipping address. > > Q: What's all this about `binary-only files'? Will BSDI continue to > ship source code? > A: For Version 1.1 only, BSDI will ship the following kernel files > in binary format: > > kern/init_main.c kern/subr_rmap.c ufs/ufs_bmap.c > kern/kern_clock.c kern/sys_generic.c ufs/ufs_disksubr.c > kern/kern_exit.c kern/sys_process.c ufs/ufs_inode.c > kern/kern_physio.c kern/tty.c ufs/ufs_vnops.c > kern/kern_sig.c kern/tty_subr.c > kern/kern_synch.c kern/vfs_syscalls.c OK, so it was 16, not 13. And yes, they didn't say that these were the ones, but I did look at one and saw the similarities. > Q: I noticed your signature changed. Did you get promoted? > A: Yes, we now have a full-time president. Me! > > Rob Kolstad > President, BSDI Well, some things just keep changing. Greg -- See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog(a)lemis.com for PGP public key Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id CAA10066 for pups-liszt; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 02:30:57 +1100 (EST) >From "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Wed Jan 6 01:24:00 1999 Received: from seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.88.4]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA10061 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 02:30:47 +1100 (EST) Received: (from rdkeys@localhost) by seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA27132; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 10:24:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rdkeys) From: "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Message-Id: <199901051524.KAA27132(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Subject: Re: Why is csh `restricted'? In-Reply-To: <199901050645.WAA19977(a)moe.2bsd.com> from "Steven M. Schultz" at "Jan 4, 99 10:45:35 pm" To: sms(a)moe.2bsd.com (Steven M. Schultz) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 10:24:00 -0500 (EST) Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk > > think somebody mentioned something like 13 files in the context of the > > I'd heard it was 7 files at one time, then 11. It's a fairly > small number _but_ the exact list was never disclosed (part of the > settlement I understand). Without a list of files the fear (at the > time) was that "the enemy" could come after you claiming derivation > of some work from the forbidden files. Since you didn't know what > files those were it was hard (impossible) to know what you could or > couldn't use. INet Dunce Cap firmly attached, in case my greymatters are vaporware.... I though I remembered seeing in one of the varieties of the 386BSD-0.0, 386BSD-0.1, FreeBSD-1.1, FreeBSD-1.1.5.1 (don't ask where, because I really don't remember exactly), a subtree with a README and the original 7 files (yes, I counted them and it was 7). Now, that makes me want to backtrack to find that and see what exactly was different. Vague memory suggests it may have been in the 1.1.5.1 suite, since that was about the time of the great territorial Unix Wars of old...... > I'm not a lawyer (and don't even play one on the Net;))... That's > how you and I (nonlawyer types) think. The sentiment at the time > was that up until 4.4-Lite was declared "uncontaminated" there was > a danger of being legally targeted for using Net-1 and Net-2. That was where the shift from the 1 release level to the 2 release level came in. Sadly, I was not really paying much attention to it all going by on the net back then, since I was tied up in AIX boxen. But, I did run across that interesting subtree and those 7 magic files, one time. Now, where DID I see them...... > The point is moot now today because all manner of alternatives > (FreeBSD for example) exist. That ready availability may have been > a big factor in SCO's allowing inexpensive access to the "original" > sources (albeit under 'license' rather than "freely available"). > > Steven I am glad it all came to pass. But, it is still fun to peruse the odd bits here and there, and sometimes real history or insights pop up. If all goes well, another minor bit of history may pop up shortly. With the graces of Dennis Ritchie, I rekeyed in the V1 manuals in roff source, in case anyone still has a model KSR37 sitting around with a box full of paper, roff, and too much time to burn. It is complete, now, but needs some editorial fixings since the OCR came through rather bad. I made the suggestion that he allow us to put a copy in the UHS archives. It may appear on his web page when the editorial fixings get done, and hopefully, minnie, too. Bob Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id CAA10122 for pups-liszt; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 02:48:35 +1100 (EST) >From "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Wed Jan 6 01:41:47 1999 Received: from seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.88.4]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA10117 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 02:48:25 +1100 (EST) Received: (from rdkeys@localhost) by seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA27177; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 10:41:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rdkeys) From: "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys" <rdkeys(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Message-Id: <199901051541.KAA27177(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Subject: OK I got this here VAXen thingie.... what is it? To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 10:41:47 -0500 (EST) Cc: bsdbob(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (Robert D. Keys) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk OK, Dummy here stuck his foot in his choppers an' won the bid on that VAXen for the grand total of eleven buckeroos de realme. What can I run with it? It was just too much fun to pass up, and it drew too many chuckles from the PC crowd in the surplus warehouse....(:+}}.... Machine: VAXstation 3500, no consoles or external boxes, only the tower. Tape Drive: TK70 Hard Drive: RA70 Boards: SLOT BOARD NUMBER DESCRIPTION ---- ------------ ---------------------------------------------- 1 KA650 -BA 2 MS650 -AA 3 MS650 -AA 4 DELQA -SA 5 VCB02 6 VCB02 7 VCB02 8 CXY08 9 TQK70 10 KDA50 11 KDA50 12 (empty) What are the above boards, for reference? What boards are needed to bring up the machine minimally and test it out? How should one fire it up the first time, without blowing it up? I am working with the original owner of the beast to see if he may have a box of odd manuals and hopefully tapes still in storage somewhere. If not, I am at ground zero with it. I am assuming it will have to be run headless, via an old VT-52ish Zenith terminal I have, or a Kermit with VT-100 emulation. I don't have the main color monitor for it, or the mouse and keyboard. What is the pinout of the silly MMJ connector on the CPU? Will a plain terminal work OK? What kinds of printer can be hooked up to it, via what protocols? What is the best way to network it into my local home ethernet coax? Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks Bob Keys

26 years, 4 months

Re: Ancient SunOS source

by Erin W. Corliss

On 3 Jan 1999, Mirian Crzig Lennox wrote: > Last month, there was some discussion about getting Sun to release the > sources to old SunOS 4.1 under the Ancient UNIX source licence. I'm > curious as to what progress has been made on that. I'm > enthusiastically looking forward to hopefully being able to run > SunOS-4.1.3 with full source on an old Sun 3/80. Have you tried the Sun 3 port of NetBSD? Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id IAA02037 for pups-liszt; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 08:53:45 +1100 (EST) >From Mirian Crzig Lennox <mirian(a)xensei.com> Mon Jan 4 07:52:16 1999 Received: from trantor.cosmic.com (xensei-PPP-0227.xensei.com [207.31.197.27]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA02032 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 08:53:33 +1100 (EST) Received: (from mirian@localhost) by trantor.cosmic.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) id QAA18338; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 16:52:17 -0500 From: Mirian Crzig Lennox <mirian(a)xensei.com> To: "Erin W. Corliss" <erin(a)coffee.corliss.net> Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au Subject: Re: Ancient SunOS source References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990103134337.31034A-100000(a)coffee.corliss.net> Original-Sender: mirian(a)xensei.com Organization: The Cosmic Computing Corporation of Alpha Centauri Date: 03 Jan 1999 16:52:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: "Erin W. Corliss"'s message of "Sun, 3 Jan 1999 13:48:20 -0800 (PST)" Message-ID: <m3lnjk81nz.fsf(a)trantor.cosmic.com> Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk "Erin W. Corliss" <erin(a)coffee.corliss.net> writes: > On 3 Jan 1999, Mirian Crzig Lennox wrote: > > > Last month, there was some discussion about getting Sun to release the > > sources to old SunOS 4.1 under the Ancient UNIX source licence. I'm > > curious as to what progress has been made on that. I'm > > enthusiastically looking forward to hopefully being able to run > > SunOS-4.1.3 with full source on an old Sun 3/80. > > Have you tried the Sun 3 port of NetBSD? Oh, NetBSD is a very nice Berkeley UNIX, to sure... I'm just looking forward to being able to play around with good olde-fashioned SunOS. Call it nostalgia, or something like that. :) -- Mirian Crzig Lennox Systems Anarchist "There's a New World Order coming every minute. Make mine extra cheese." Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA02089 for pups-liszt; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 09:09:47 +1100 (EST) >From "Erin W. Corliss" <erin(a)coffee.corliss.net> Mon Jan 4 08:11:30 1999 Received: from coffee.corliss.net (erin(a)coffee.gta-tech.com.121.7.12.in-addr.arpa [12.7.121.245] (may be forged)) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA02084 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 09:09:38 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (erin@localhost) by coffee.corliss.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA31265 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 14:11:30 -0800 Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 14:11:30 -0800 (PST) From: "Erin W. Corliss" <erin(a)coffee.corliss.net> To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au Subject: ... Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990103140148.31189A-100000(a)coffee.corliss.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk Anyone care to comment on the likelihood of someone being able to modify the kernel binary for Unix version 7 so that it treats a 60 megabyte RD52 drive like an array of six RL drives? I looked at the device-specific assembly code in boot blocks for the two drives and it seems that besides the geometry they're pretty similar... I assume, of course, that the binary license doesn't allow me to disassemble or modify the kernel, tho. I also recently solved the disk image dilemma -- I made a utility in Visual Basic that lets you examine, import, and export files on various disk images. The disk-specific parts are in interchangeable ActiveX modules -- right now I only have code for RK06 disk images with Unix 6 or RSTS file systems, but the model is easily expandable to any drive/filesystem combination. I'll put it on my web site if anyone's interested... Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA02281 for pups-liszt; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:19:04 +1100 (EST) >From Greg Lehey <grog(a)lemis.com> Mon Jan 4 09:18:07 1999 Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA02276 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:18:38 +1100 (EST) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by allegro.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id JAA29033; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 09:48:05 +1030 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) id JAA70032; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 09:48:07 +1030 (CST) Message-ID: <19990104094807.X66110(a)freebie.lemis.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 09:48:07 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog(a)lemis.com> To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au, Unix Heritage Society <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au> Subject: Re: Yet Another Apout Version References: <199901031151.WAA26388(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199901031151.WAA26388(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>; from Warren Toomey on Sun, Jan 03, 1999 at 10:51:45PM +1100 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk On Sunday, 3 January 1999 at 22:51:45 +1100, Warren Toomey wrote: > Hmm, > The tarball of Apout that I put up for ftp had a file missing, > and a serious bug which caused 2.11BSD ls -l to go into an infinite loop. > I've removed this version and placed a new version of Apout in: > > ftp://minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/pub/PDP-11/Sims/Apout/ > > Things are looking good. With a small bit of manual help, I was > able to run make in 2.11BSD /usr/src/bin, which rebuilds all of > the binaries in /bin. How long did it take, on what kind of machine? Greg -- See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog(a)lemis.com for PGP public key Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA02475 for pups-liszt; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 11:24:26 +1100 (EST) >From "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Mon Jan 4 10:18:11 1999 Received: from moe.2bsd.com (0(a)MOE.2BSD.COM [206.139.202.200]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA02469 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 11:24:16 +1100 (EST) Received: (from sms@localhost) by moe.2bsd.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id QAA18722 for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 16:18:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 16:18:11 -0800 (PST) From: "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Message-Id: <199901040018.QAA18722(a)moe.2bsd.com> To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au Subject: Re: ... Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk Hi - > From: "Erin W. Corliss" <erin(a)coffee.corliss.net> > > Anyone care to comment on the likelihood of someone being able to modify > the kernel binary for Unix version 7 so that it treats a 60 megabyte RD52 > drive like an array of six RL drives? Not likely at all. Completely different controllers - the only similarity between an RL controller and an MSCP (RQDX3 for example) controller lies in their both being Qbus cards and disks are attached to them. The RL is about as smart as a rock - it can't even do spiral reads/writes (even the RK05 could do that), so there's code present to break transfers up into multiple pieces if cylinder and side boundaries are crossed. Also the RL is a "traditional" device in that the driver calculates sector/track/cylinder and stuffs those values into registers. With MSCP you have to build command and response ring buffers, fill in a packet with rather badly documented values, and then poke the controller to go look for its new packet. The geometry calculations are done in the controller not the driver. The only concept of geometry that MSCP drivers have is "how many sectors does the drive have" (and even then that value's only used to pretty print something when the drive is first accessed) - somewhat like SCSI in that aspect. Then too the RD52 is 30MB (sect/trak = 18, tracks/cyl = 7, cyl = 480). The RD53 is ~70mb and the RD54 is ~159mb. It'd be easier to add an MSCP driver to V7 than it would be to try and do binary edits on the RL driver to support non-RL devices. Ick. > I looked at the device-specific assembly code in boot blocks for the two > drives and it seems that besides the geometry they're pretty similar... I They're about as different as can be. I think you were lulled into thinking they're similar by the fact that most of the bootblock is "boiler plate" (the filesystem search code to look for /boot). The part that deals with the device is small but quite dissimilar. The bootblock is the least/smallest part of the problem. All the boot- block does is load /boot - and that's where you need a more fullfeatured (but still not as full as the kernel's) driver. Then once there's a standalone driver for a device in /boot then, and only then, does the kernel become involved (at which time a full driver is needed). > assume, of course, that the binary license doesn't allow me to disassemble > or modify the kernel, tho. The A.U. license provides full up source - no need to disassemble anything - that can be modified to whatever extent is desired. That won't solve the problem of getting a MSCP driver into V7 unless one can do the development work using a simulator. Steven Schultz Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id GAA06247 for pups-liszt; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 06:48:52 +1100 (EST) >From Billy Stivers <alyosha(a)vrytekai.Corp.Sun.COM> Tue Jan 5 05:47:03 1999 Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id GAA06242 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 06:48:42 +1100 (EST) Received: from Corp.Sun.COM ([129.145.35.78]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id LAA18859; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 11:48:02 -0800 Received: from vrytekai.Corp.Sun.COM by Corp.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3) id LAA14535; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 11:48:01 -0800 Received: from vrytekai (vrytekai [129.145.71.165]) by vrytekai.Corp.Sun.COM (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA05888; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 11:47:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199901041947.LAA05888(a)vrytekai.Corp.Sun.COM> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 11:47:03 -0800 (PST) From: Billy Stivers <alyosha(a)vrytekai.Corp.Sun.COM> Reply-To: Billy Stivers <alyosha(a)vrytekai.Corp.Sun.COM> Subject: Re: Ancient SunOS source To: erin(a)coffee.corliss.net, mirian(a)xensei.com Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: 7SK+ImZBXKMmaeX/roFFdg== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 CDE Version 1.3 SunOS 5.7 sun4u sparc Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk These efforts aren't dead. :) They just took vacation with me, for the last week and a half or so. I'll try to report some news sometime during the following week or two, though with the mess of work that popped up in my absence, I'm not sure whether I'd be that optimistic. :/ --Billy >From: Mirian Crzig Lennox <mirian(a)xensei.com> >To: "Erin W. Corliss" <erin(a)coffee.corliss.net> >Cc: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au >Subject: Re: Ancient SunOS source >Original-Sender: mirian(a)xensei.com >Date: 03 Jan 1999 16:52:16 -0500 > >"Erin W. Corliss" <erin(a)coffee.corliss.net> writes: > >> On 3 Jan 1999, Mirian Crzig Lennox wrote: >> >> > Last month, there was some discussion about getting Sun to release the >> > sources to old SunOS 4.1 under the Ancient UNIX source licence. I'm >> > curious as to what progress has been made on that. I'm >> > enthusiastically looking forward to hopefully being able to run >> > SunOS-4.1.3 with full source on an old Sun 3/80. >> >> Have you tried the Sun 3 port of NetBSD? > >Oh, NetBSD is a very nice Berkeley UNIX, to sure... I'm just looking >forward to being able to play around with good olde-fashioned SunOS. >Call it nostalgia, or something like that. :) > >-- >Mirian Crzig Lennox Systems Anarchist > "There's a New World Order coming every minute. > Make mine extra cheese." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a "Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble. -- Mahatma Gandhi

26 years, 4 months

Yet Another Apout Version

by Warren Toomey

Hmm, The tarball of Apout that I put up for ftp had a file missing, and a serious bug which caused 2.11BSD ls -l to go into an infinite loop. I've removed this version and placed a new version of Apout in: ftp://minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/pub/PDP-11/Sims/Apout/ Things are looking good. With a small bit of manual help, I was able to run make in 2.11BSD /usr/src/bin, which rebuilds all of the binaries in /bin. I've even (nearly) been able to build the GENERIC 2.11BSD kernel in /sys/GENERIC, but I get: # make .... ld -X -i -o unix scb.o mch_backup.o mch_click.o mch_copy.o ..... sys_process.o syscalls.o ufs_mount.o -Z hk.o init_main.o kern_prot.o tty_pty.o quota_kern.o quota_subr.o quota_ufs.o vm_swp.o vm_swap.o vm_proc.o -Z ht.o tm.o ts.o -Z tmscp.o tmscpdump.o -Z rl.o mch_fpsim.o ingreslock.o ufs_disksubr.o -Z rx.o kern_sysctl.o vm_sched.o vm_text.o -Z kern_pdp.o kern_xxx.o ufs_syscalls2.o mem.o ufs_subr.o rk.o sys_pipe.o kern_sig2.o toy.o subr_log.o -Z -Z -Z -Z -Z -Z -Y vers.o -lkern param.o Undefined: _proc _file _text *** Exit 1 Stop. # ls -l unix -rw------- 1 root 195480 Jan 3 03:41 unix Steven, any ideas as to the problem? I had to do two operations manually (using 32-bit native tools): sh ../conf/newvers.sh /bin/ed - param.s < ../conf/:comm-to-bss Cheers all, Warren Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id EAA01186 for pups-liszt; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 04:17:03 +1100 (EST) >From Michael Sokolov <msokolov(a)harrier.Uznet.NET> Mon Jan 4 03:16:23 1999 Received: from harrier.Uznet.NET (harrier.ml.org [193.220.92.194]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA01181 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 04:16:50 +1100 (EST) Received: from dosdev (pm7-94.dial.qual.net [205.212.2.94]) by harrier.Uznet.NET (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA04342 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au>; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 22:16:30 +0500 Message-Id: <199901031716.WAA04342(a)harrier.Uznet.NET> From: Michael Sokolov <msokolov(a)harrier.Uznet.NET> Date: 3 Jan 1999 17:16:23 GMT To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Subject: Time machine Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk Dear PUPS/TUHS members, Have you ever wished to have a time machine? Have you ever wished to travel back to 1988, to the time when 4.3BSD-Tahoe was the latest release and the SCCS deltas corresponding to it were the most recent deltas? Well, at least I do. Although unfortunately real time travel is still limited to the X-Files, I have come up with a pretty good approximation, a time machine program. This program turns the Universe clock backwards on a given SCCS file, pruning it down to a given delta, specified either as an SID or as a delta serial number. The bulk of the work is done by the SCCS rmdel command. This command, however, can only delete one delta at a time and still leaves an audit trail in the delta table. My package consists of a shell script and two C programs that compensate these deficiencies. The result is that the SCCS file becomes byte-for-byte identical to the one that existed at the time you have chosen, just like with a real time machine! I include this package below as a uuencoded gzipped tarball. See the README file inside. Sincerely, Michael Sokolov Cellular phone: 216-217-2579 ARPA Internet SMTP mail: msokolov(a)harrier.Uznet.NET Enclosure: uuencoded tmachine.tar.gz: begin 644 tmachine.tar.gz M'XL(`)3,CS8``.T9:V_;-K!?S5]Q29TFSN+8DE]`TQ08DA8HT&Y`TWY*@U66 M:)NS)`HD'<];\]]W1UJVE*1MMB(QMN@`P]+I>&^2=^2[8,I'(N9/[A$`H-_M M`O[[[7:;_@%ZGOLG\+L^4O2[G4&[WQETZ6NOYS^!^]2I`@=!'#^'9!KQV`2Q MT`:,$HE],\.8L<*7$MEAR&IA",U?H2E+P\LTK,CM>8EWB4/QPW6J37OH_PWO M7_U\^N[5_<KXSOSW/42Z^8^/O0ZBNH-!MYK_#P$?)AR,2#@D03@1*8<L"*?! MF$,H4XV36(,<@2&BG$!/>!R##I7(#`1I!&8NX81E2HY5D.B#TG)@OQ?G,Z!` MS>$$<GH(%`>1&IY&'&DE##D3Z:6<XMMP8467),HT7AQ`*@U$0O'0Q(N<;*:Y M.F3LM5`H.)1)AMN:_5`0AJ1JEJ8B'<-N@EO?KE4H!1X)<XN9S`D]`)WQ4(P6 M-(ZH0JE(-L0R#(Q`3\%(*C<>G3$4::`$U["0,Y@$EQQ^GVG#0L4#@U:13W+R M($I$:C&*?`1G)R=GI'N"*&UUNSTZ0K-4S@$Y1@MR&MJ^Q=@'7$EG*K6</Z;B MDBMT=8A*3F&(`^>!BC">*`_&^#%UTFCW/R"O/,?E>BW'3%I&MI!3BZA:^I#H M(`ZT^<T&D['YA*LB9NDD,IP4H`_@/I`?YD%J2-,IY]DAO,&=`GU"P<Y'H6,T M<(%#%335V9M30!\U@S-\W<.P$8+\A(]+:5R)((9TE@RY.F"*$R.#=L6+AO/< MRCR8"TR@(;I11DM1(88PPG#&"TNKUC08099(1-!(#<NH8<H%B4O)(**!<#@, MIA[I2`\^F69*,HG>\F88[`2M$)CK&-MLD4\IJ<084R4NQL%.&.L]8VX9P];\ M@Q$1X/[M4F?7S:1(ILAE."/7CL@*8N8<9H)A3)F#LV&6\NB0G?*8&TNA<VL= M4XH7,=.8W-KZ:XYQ6<T-%(7>GL5&'U:[\W\<2O7:/<GXSO[?\;Q5_3_P!STB M[WN=:O]_"'@JTC">11Q>:!,)>3AYR=BE%+A#!2+>2_2XP<))H&`?'X_87ZPV MRF9&TP?<%$W$E6H<L1K_0Y@]#Y^N&&[>N+8'(MT+U#C$!4V-+QL62>]'2V[[ MA+;\7K]Y^PKVM5O]]BD/\\>`^&-NTCO*(!;#A1:X%./2CPC'"1'Y<XQKTWG/ M\R^.&)*/P&H`6\?0@R]?K"+G_L5Y^X)0N\W=(M)SR&`7GCV[CE2[#5:K67]L ME_HA+%/P*<KW:RO_4[I-#EE*S]D<6]X-0'MKU@8XAC:2U=`2?`R,%#DY_`0^ M<;A"K\:X+A>'>':(?2Q06V)6LR[$+R.9\=1Q\RX.8%NM%%I2',,O']^^)9LR M#)]4.2V1Y?XO\^D0G_F*SYKH=E8=QZH8OS*_[C5^9<K;F7:)J:,?C3FF('G[ M`-<1'_.!!C:^;9E3'!-D&?]/[;9G4\`BEZ&>%$*=1W>UXRY#2Z7;WM&1"Z;- MN\@L,E0EPLB<^]T+"A(E:V33E%[NIO,M2M]-:VVU_H[:/ZJ%UF&0CI9CMTF/ M"'9"V-&PLU_X1=L'\*S@$'I#/S3@!73NJN66S7?G8">;9LFQ=:CE41MB438E M<IPEZVEB::UL.^%.[63>TD:%2;9G=2&-&DO&R[GGHE1B:KE>L9O\G`&9PNB. M]M9+U?:.1O67W(E!*47N[/C;/%]*@.-5`J!=>0(0DN_>=,L56VM:G%^D;F35 M)6]2?HZP0]#<K0XVP=U[;E\1561$>,5MO]&FA7_3.UD%_P;RFOX^96!!-^CU MOG[^.^AWEO6?U_7Z]ORWWZG.?QX$GFZUAB)MZ0E["KB9I6/7,8YD',LYM;FT MSFCJ;C,I7`?O^O[5V89K'U<G+/9(A$?,GFP<MV9:M0@5MRR"V5ZUB+:(XCGS M<6LB$]Y*M)S*6%ZV\@QM%6A*Y\I?'5`^RJX7SZ7J'M1]0-*LM>Y_ZG6'62US MB&%A9HD]V^Y3*P]4(a)(D4/J.=-SE\9I%DM;H[S6FJ.A'7/49M.4LNUZQ\5B\= M>J^Y%:5_QFUS20\OB8]*H#FZF]Z31$;0Q;X+A]7=.5/S3WHI54GEP_;[R;'O M]']>O]W+Y[_O]?M$/NCWJOG_$+#Q_H^^%/JYK_9P_KHR+U\J?:,+N]Y=>:Z' M6-5B1&/-R5_NL4G0*\NP4"Q86>PA;G0.5E.=:^=JX5OUT_^\'["\HS)O5^-' M-XK\_6]4^:OZWK]K?5\LYUV);(.PMM.]KW4KU_OKJIR,?5\T%M6GFX%LIG`? M2V7:5#R1ESQR)Z`Z5Z)<GY?2X<<J[OF$.MB]-4=2<;7:%C*M7#IOL/_;]/I3 M0045;`ZJ^__'#=7]?W7_7]W_5_?_U?W_XX3J_O]QP\;/?ZK[_^K^O[K_K^[_ MJ_O_ZOZ_@@>'ZO[_<4-U_U_=_U?W_X\7-M[_5??_U?U_=?^_L?O_OP%(*:`Y $`$```/Z_ ` end Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id GAA01508 for pups-liszt; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 06:21:26 +1100 (EST) >From Mirian Crzig Lennox <mirian(a)xensei.com> Mon Jan 4 05:20:02 1999 Received: from trantor.cosmic.com (xensei-PPP-0227.xensei.com [207.31.197.27]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA01503 for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 06:21:13 +1100 (EST) Received: (from mirian@localhost) by trantor.cosmic.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) id OAA17969; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 14:20:03 -0500 From: Mirian Crzig Lennox <mirian(a)xensei.com> To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au Subject: Ancient SunOS source References: <199812161520.KAA28340(a)seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> Original-Sender: mirian(a)xensei.com Organization: The Cosmic Computing Corporation of Alpha Centauri Date: 03 Jan 1999 14:20:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: "User Rdkeys Robert D. Keys"'s message of "Wed, 16 Dec 1998 10:20:18 -0500 (EST)" Message-ID: <m31zlccgf1.fsf(a)trantor.cosmic.com> Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk Last month, there was some discussion about getting Sun to release the sources to old SunOS 4.1 under the Ancient UNIX source licence. I'm curious as to what progress has been made on that. I'm enthusiastically looking forward to hopefully being able to run SunOS-4.1.3 with full source on an old Sun 3/80. -- Mirian Crzig Lennox Systems Anarchist "There's a New World Order coming every minute. Make mine extra cheese."

26 years, 4 months

New Apout Sim Version

by Warren Toomey

All, Welcome to 1999, I hope you all had a good Christmas and New Year. I've just released a new version of my Apout PDP-11 simulator at ftp://minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/pub/PDP-11/Sims/Apout/ The 6th/7th Edition stuff is untouched, but the emulator can now run a significant number of binaries from 2.11BSD: /bin/sh, make, the C compiler, most of /bin and /usr/bin. I've been able to rebuild both ls and sh from the sources. Although the emulated 2.11BSD environment isn't complete, its enough to be nearly useful! Cheers all, Warren

26 years, 4 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

TUHS