--- Norman Wilson <norman(a)nose.cs.utoronto.ca> wrote:
I just saw this:
This either Very Smart or Very Dumb, I'm not sure which.
I will just point out the recursive conflict when he says
I can't talk about how this information will be applied, nor by
who. You'll have to trust me, or at any rate my record as
ambassador to the community ...
I find it hard to take a secret No Secrets campaign seriously.
If I am to be used as an example of something or to promote some
cause, I think it's only fair that the campaigner tell me just
what he's up to first.
If ESR told the world what he was going to do with the evidence then the
opposition would be able to prepare for it.
That such a campaign exists in the current context
also sounds to
me like an admission that substantial parts of Linux were in fact
lifted directly from a licensed UNIX.
Hmmm. Either that or he's trying to keep all the bases covered. What happened
in reality and what they prove in the courts need not be the same as we have
seen as time and again Microsoft goes to trial and gets off.
It helps to have a fallback arguement ready.
That that might be so seems
surprising; that someone would want to prove it was OK even more so.
TUHS mailing list
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).