12 May
12 May
5:31 a.m.
Thank you. I incorporated this into the svn tree and the image building
process. We're now using the bos boot method instead of loading the
kernel with a simh loadfile.
Tim Newsham
http://www.thenewsh.com/~newsham/
7:47 a.m.
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 01:31:25PM -1000, Tim Newsham wrote:
Thank you. I incorporated this into the svn tree and
the image building
process. We're now using the bos boot method instead of loading the
kernel with a simh loadfile.
Tim, the new boot method seems to make the output from the running kernel
very sluggish, e.g. ls -l /bin takes ages to arrive. Can you do a quick
compare old vs. new?
Warren
9:31 a.m.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:47:21AM +1000, Warren Toomey wrote:
Tim, the new boot method seems to make the output from
the running kernel
very sluggish, e.g. ls -l /bin takes ages to arrive. Can you do a quick
compare old vs. new?
I take that back. I was ssh'd into my home machine and running simh over
the link. I think the output from the 1st Edition kernel comes out in
clumps (i.e. a small internal buffer's worth), and each clump was being
shipped over the link as a single TCP packet; hence I was seeing latency
between the clumps. My apologies.
Warren
5851
days inactive
5852
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
James A. Markevitch -
Tim Newsham -
Warren Toomey