[pups] AVIV vs. DigiData tape controller
cdl at mpl.ucsd.edu
Thu Mar 15 02:58:28 AEST 2001
> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:28:41 -0500 (EST)
> From: "Gregory R. Travis" <greg at ciswired.com>
> To: pups at minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au
> Subject: [pups] AVIV vs. DigiData tape controller
> I've got an AVIV TFC-825 UNIBUS controller on my 11/44. I'm virtually certain
> it emulates a TS11.
> It appears to support Pertec formatted tape drives. It has two
> cable interfaces, labeled Pertec P1 and Pertec P2.
> I currently have a DigiData Pertec formatted 9-track drive plugged into a
> DigiData controller on my QBUS 11/83. Works fine. Now I'd like to use
> the drive to bootstrap the 11/44.
> The DigiData drive's cables are both 49-pin ribbons. Sure enough,
> the DigiData controller's cable headers are also 49-pin (what a wonderful
> world, eh?)
> However, the AVIV controller's cable headers are 59-pin!
Are you sure those numbers aren't 50 and 60, respectively? Most
of the connecting cables for tape drives used twisted-pair ribbon
> Anyone have any insight into what's going on here? Isn't a Pertec
> interface a Pertec interface? Or is the DigiData using some kind of
> proprietary (to DigiData) interface?
For what it's worth, there were two "standard" Pertec interfaces.
I think of them as Early Pertec and Late Pertec. Late Pertec is
the two 50-pin cables.
Early Pertec connected to the drive with three cables, Read data,
Write data, and Control. Usually there was a custom cable set
that broke out to three cables from the connectors on the controller.
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenstein at ucsd.edu
Received: (from major at localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA83014
for pups-liszt; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 05:19:36 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from owner-pups at minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au)
More information about the TUHS