27 Feb
2017
27 Feb
'17
2:49 a.m.
On Sunday, 26 February 2017 at 7:50:50 -0500, Noel Chiappa wrote:
There were in theory portable languages beforehand (e.g. PL/1), but
I think it probably over-specified things - e.g. it would be
impossible to port Multics to another architecture without almost
completely re-writing it from scratch, the code is shot through with
"fixed bin(18)"'s every other line...
That may be coloured by your perspective. C was never designed to be
portable, while much older languages like Algol and Cobol were. There
were quite different reasons for C's success.
To quote "The Programmer's ABC'sâ from Datamation, April 1976:
C is for Cobol
What a pity
It was designed
By a committee
Greg
--
Sent from my desktop computer.
Finger grog(a)lemis.com for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program
reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA