5 Mar
2018
5 Mar
'18
4:36 a.m.
On Mar 4, 2018, at 1:50 PM, Ralph Corderoy
<ralph(a)inputplus.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Doug,
Bakul wrote:
Thanks Ralph and Toby. “Because it was clearly described and published”
was the point I was trying to make and should’ve stopped there : ). SP&E
article had made a strong impression on me and that is what I instantly
thought of.
I remembered reading about Knuth's
line-breaking algorithm in Software
Practice & Experience in early eighties and being quite impressed with
it. So may be that clear description of the algorithm has something
to do with it? Ah, here it is:
“Breaking Paragraphs into lines” by Donald Knuth & Plass, SP&E, Volume
11, issue 11, Nov. 1981
That's more to do with TeX looking at the whole paragraph when deciding
where to split lines. Hyphenation is part of that because a word might
help out by being the ideal thing to split and have the rest of the
lines sit easily in their length, but TeX's hyphenation algorithm is
distinct again.
Ted Harding gives some background on the groff list back in 2001,
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2001-03/msg00026.html
but I expect groff used TeX's algorithm because it was published, could
handle multiple languages, e.g. hyphen.us, and the data files were
available to contort into what groff ended up using in its simplified
TeX algorithm.
$ cd /usr/share/groff/1.22.3/tmac
$ ls hyphen*
hyphen.den hyphenex.cs hyphenex.us hyphen.sv hyphen.us
hyphen.cs hyphen.det hyphenex.de hyphen.fr
$
They've comments explaining their content.
Werner Lemburg on the groff list probably knows for certain as he had to
fathom all this out before becoming groff's excellent maintainer for
many years.
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy