18 Jun
2015
18 Jun
'15
7:04 p.m.
On 18 June 2015 at 13:32, Kurt H Maier <khm(a)sciops.net> wrote:
Quoting Aram Hăvărneanu <aram.h(a)mgk.ro>:
Indeed. Some years ago, we were hosting a standards meeting and went
out to copy the latest draft. The first shop would not touch it
because it said copyright -- despite the author being present with
identification. Kinko's, as it was then, copied it after we signed a
waiver.
N.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Dave Horsfall
<dave(a)horsfall.org> wrote:
These subtleties are lost on the people who work the front desk at print
shops. Anti-litigation practices indicate that anything with any kind of
copyright verbage is verboten.
And you won't even get that far if the material contains the dreaded word
"Copyright"...
Plan 9 (including the manuals) is licensed under the LPL, which is
quite similar to the MIT license.