Re: Venix (was Re: 2.9BSD: mbuf.h)

<I'm sorry. I didn't mean to imply that you were wrong, just that I was. Not an argument, just posting to the group what went private by error. <Never looked carefully at RQDX?, but the DELQA uses an M68K, that much I <*do* know. (As do the DELUA) Having two Qbus VAXen and several Qbus PDP-11s it's old turf. Also I worked for DEC Engineering. that and I've done a lot of hardware level work on my systems (repaired dead boards) so the designs are more familair. <You obviously knows more about this than I do. :-) <However, as I said, atleast the DELQA have an M68K... <And the DEQNA is old, yes... DELQA is not 68k, The DEUNA is. The DELQA is a cost reduced version (less buggy too) of the DEQNA and is largely logically the same as the DEQNA. <> The DEUNA is quite different. < <Obviously. But it is also pretty old. Not as buggy though, which should <have been a clue. :-) Also The DELUA. Allison Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA19690 for pups-liszt; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 12:59:39 +1100 (EST) Received: from dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.2]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA19683 for &lt;pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au&gt;au>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 12:59:27 +1100 (EST) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id TAA22942; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 19:58:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from roc-ny1-19.ix.netcom.com(199.183.209.51) by dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma022871; Thu Feb 18 19:58:23 1999 Message-ID: <006401be5baa$06ce3da0$33d1b7c7@eric-edwards> From: "Eric Edwards" &lt;eekg(a)ix.netcom.com&gt; To: "maximum entropy" &lt;entropy(a)zippy.bernstein.com&gt;om>, &lt;pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au&gt; Subject: Re: 2.9BSD: mbuf.h Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 20:48:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk I'm not sure if anyone mentioned this, but you can build a working 2.9 kernel (sans network) from the sources by just commenting out the references to the networking include files. I think there is an offending reference in syslocal.c also. Eric Edwards eekg(a)ix.netcom.com mag(a)csh.rit.edu -----Original Message----- From: maximum entropy &lt;entropy(a)zippy.bernstein.com&gt; To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au &lt;pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au&gt; Date: Tuesday, February 16, 1999 11:36 PM Subject: 2.9BSD: mbuf.h Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA19762 for pups-liszt; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 13:14:46 +1100 (EST) Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20]) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA19757 for &lt;pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au&gt;au>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 13:14:38 +1100 (EST) Received: from world.std.com by europe.std.com (STD1.2/BZS-8-1.0) id VAA07685; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 21:14:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by world.std.com (TheWorld/Spike-2.0) id AA14211; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 21:14:32 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 21:14:32 -0500 From: allisonp(a)world.std.com (Allison J Parent) Message-Id: &lt;199902190214.AA14211(a)world.std.com&gt; To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au Subject: Re: DEQNA (was was Re: 2.9BSD: mbuf.h) Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au Precedence: bulk <The DEQNA uses a Intel 8751 (an EPROM version of 8051 family). I suspect th <it may deal with the programming protocol and the ring buffers. The <chip with the F (with bars top and bottom of the letter) is probably <Fujitsu. Correct on both cases. <These boards had a fairly bad reputation for lockups and dropped packets. <There was a 20+ wire ECO along with a PAL chip (with 8 of the pins cut off <soldered on top of another chip. Actually there were revs A->n and each rev had a step. The last one was N-11... it was marginal. Good one tended to be good and the bad were PITA. Also they tended to fail far often than MTBF predictions. <The replacement ethernet controller was the DELQA, which was a complete <redesign and used a 68000 processor. The DELQA was not 68000. The board was far to small for that and had to be Qbus dual width and compatable with DEQNA. I have a few of them in my vaxen too. The Unibus versions DEUNA and the later DELUA were 68k and very good. They were partly the reason why 730s and 750s were used for routers long after they were replaced for other tasks. Allison Received: (from major@localhost) by minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA19811 for pups-liszt; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 13:23:12 +1100 (EST)