2 Aug
2010
2 Aug
'10
6:11 a.m.
Hi,
I've read all your posts in the QEMU mailing list and the TUHS one and I'm
answering to both lists in a hope my mail enlights you and any other curious.
First of all, old UNIX systems (and I put my hand on the fire for DG/UX also), use a
monolithic linked at setup/later time kernel.
That is, even if you get a driver (IDE, virtio, whatsoever), the configuration files, the
kernel, the ramdisk, everything that lets your system boot, MUST HAVE BEEN BOOT from the
AIC controller, the driver is hardcoded, no way to change it.
If you have extensive knowledge of what files a driver setup modifies on DG/UX
specifically (knowledge from other UNIX, forget it, they are as different as Porsche and
Ferrari motors), you can always get a new kernel with the drivers you need to make it boot
and manually put them in your image.
In the case, you meet this requirements, and, you do it, you can then achieve to other
problems. The DG/UX workstations are x86 machines, but nothing swears they are PC
compatible machines, and they can have a different memory map for some critical device, or
include critical devices never found in a PC (like an Intel Macintosh does for example).
Just booting from a BIOS doesn't make the machines be the same (PowerPC Macintosh,
IBM POWER workstations, Genesi Pegasos, are machines that boot OpenFirmware with heavily
different configurations, devices and memory maps).
Also, you are assuming IDE is available in DG/UX just because the controller is present in
the hardware. That hardware was also used for Windows NT. IDE support can be JUST FOR
Windows, and the DG/UX manufacturer just decided to not include an IDE driver in the
kernel (happened in AIX for PCs until last version of all, only SCSI was supported, being
a hugely strange controller in PC worlds).
In the case you opt for making a driver (adding IDE, virtio, or other SCSI support) for
the DG/UX need to say you need, low level knowledge of the hardware, low level knowledge
of the operating system, a working machine (for sure, with the hardware available), a
debug machine (almost sure also), C and maybe assembler knowledge. In a scale of 10, this
puts the difficulty in 8 for most of programmers, and surely if you were one you stacked
with the first option everyone gave you (see next sentence).
The easiest way, and the one that people answered you already in QEMU's mailing list
(in a scale of 10 the difficulty is 6 or even 5), is creating an emulated device
(that's the correct term, not "driver") for an emulator, like QEMU, Bochs,
VirtualBox (forget this option for VMWare, VirtualPC or Parallels) that adds the AIC SCSI
controller you exactly need.
Why is this easiest? You don't need any DG/UX working system, you don't need to
know how DG/UX works, you don't need to compile a kernel, copy it to your image.
You just take the Adaptec's documentation, and start coding, making a SCSI emulated
controller, and testing it with systems you can always reinstall, debug, and check, until
they fully work (Windows, Linux, BSD, take your choice).
And then, you just polish it until your DG/UX boots, or finds the memory map as a mess it
doesnt like.
Finally, please stop begging on all the internet, spend that time coding the driver or
getting the money to pay a programmer that will do.
Sincerely yours,
Natalia Portillo
Claunia.com CEO
QEMU's Official OS Support List maintainer